Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.2% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($458.31 Million) from net assets ($59.96 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1994–2024)
This chart shows how Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1994 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 99.2%, reflecting net assets of $59.96 Billion with intangible assets of $458.31 Million USD. See defensive interval ratio of Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (1994–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR from 1994 to 2024, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see SIM market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99.2% | $59.20 Billion | $446.75 Million | $74.81 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 99.0% | $50.10 Billion | $496.83 Million | $68.02 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 98.9% | $47.99 Billion | $511.10 Million | $67.63 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 99.0% | $2.05 Billion | $21.51 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 98.7% | $1.67 Billion | $21.93 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 98.4% | $1.73 Billion | $27.59 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 98.6% | $35.18 Billion | $485.89 Million | $48.20 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 98.3% | $33.33 Billion | $582.99 Million | $45.41 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2016 | 97.8% | $33.21 Billion | $730.11 Million | $41.64 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2015 | 96.9% | $29.53 Billion | $913.39 Million | $36.72 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 96.1% | $27.78 Billion | $1.09 Billion | $35.90 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2013 | 94.7% | $26.27 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $33.28 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2012 | 92.9% | $25.82 Billion | $1.84 Billion | $32.69 Billion | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2011 | 99.4% | $24.27 Billion | $138.67 Million | $31.27 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 99.1% | $287.81 Billion | $2.55 Billion | $397.78 Billion | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2009 | 86.3% | $21.31 Billion | $2.92 Billion | $30.81 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 86.3% | $21.31 Billion | $2.92 Billion | $30.81 Billion | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2007 | 99.0% | $17.22 Billion | $172.49 Million | $22.80 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 98.6% | $12.50 Billion | $180.76 Million | $17.40 Billion | ▲ +9365.8 pp |
| 2005 | -9267.2% | $6.56 Billion | $614.73 Billion | $8.92 Billion | ▼ -9367.2 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $4.61 Billion | $0.00 | $5.99 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $4.61 Billion | $0.00 | $5.99 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $3.60 Billion | $0.00 | $5.22 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $1.08 Billion | $0.00 | $4.80 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $1.83 Billion | $0.00 | $5.08 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.73 Billion | $0.00 | $5.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $1.53 Billion | $0.00 | $4.49 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $1.62 Billion | $0.00 | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $1.46 Billion | $0.00 | $3.92 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $1.49 Billion | $0.00 | $3.75 Billion | — |