Penske Automotive Group Inc (PAG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Penske Automotive Group Inc (PAG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $215.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.64 Billion) in one year. Explore Penske Automotive Group Inc long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Penske Automotive Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Penske Automotive Group Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Penske Automotive Group Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Penske Automotive Group Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Penske Automotive Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PAG market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.06 Billion | $12.80 Billion | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $1.18 Billion | $11.49 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $1.09 Billion | $10.92 Billion | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.94 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $1.29 Billion | $9.37 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $1.20 Billion | $9.92 Billion | ▲ +159.9% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $518.60 Million | $11.13 Billion | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $614.70 Million | $8.27 Billion | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $623.50 Million | $8.11 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $372.90 Million | $7.08 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $392.30 Million | $6.18 Billion | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $366.30 Million | $5.55 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $319.60 Million | $4.89 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $326.10 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▲ +325.1% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $63.48 Million | $3.36 Billion | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $199.32 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $303.44 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $407.07 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $310.07 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +152.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $120.28 Million | $3.17 Billion | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $192.91 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $191.77 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $202.89 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $113.26 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2001 | 50.63x | $72.44 Billion | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +126963.1% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $51.84 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $50.41 Million | $848.47 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $43.70 Million | $842.50 Million | ▲ +1201.5% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $-3.18 Million | $675.10 Million | ▼ -110.6% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $10.70 Million | $241.50 Million | ▲ +203.7% |
| 1995 | -0.04x | $-7.40 Million | $173.20 Million | — |