Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -14.03x as of June 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $-316.86 Million could theoretically repay -14% of its total liabilities ($22.58 Million) in one year. See Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tri Continental Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tri Continental Closed Fund across 26 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Tri Continental Closed Fund to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tri Continental Closed Fund (1996–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tri Continental Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 139.97x | $435.70 Million | $3.11 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2020 | 98.84x | $197.96 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2019 | 156.17x | $341.30 Million | $2.19 Million | ▲ +1211.9% |
| 2018 | -14.05x | $-73.45 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -111.1% |
| 2017 | 126.32x | $280.96 Million | $2.22 Million | ▲ +886.8% |
| 2016 | 12.80x | $185.42 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +303.2% |
| 2015 | -6.30x | $-32.23 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -136.1% |
| 2014 | 17.43x | $146.04 Million | $8.38 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 2013 | 54.29x | $313.40 Million | $5.77 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2012 | 33.61x | $164.70 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +4784.6% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $68.40 Million | $99.40 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2010 | 1.96x | $162.70 Million | $82.80 Million | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2009 | 0.88x | $172.30 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2008 | -14.12x | $-1.00 Billion | $70.88 Million | ▼ -4426.2% |
| 2007 | -0.31x | $-19.00 Million | $60.91 Million | ▼ -100.3% |
| 2006 | 93.90x | $386.70 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +3007.3% |
| 2005 | 3.02x | $41.10 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2004 | 12.56x | $276.40 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2003 | 133.54x | $467.40 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2002 | -193.10x | $-753.10 Million | $3.90 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2001 | -77.56x | $-372.30 Million | $4.80 Million | ▼ -751.4% |
| 2000 | -9.11x | $-381.70 Million | $41.90 Million | ▼ -112.3% |
| 1999 | 73.80x | $376.40 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 1998 | 220.24x | $814.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +987.5% |
| 1997 | 20.25x | $716.90 Million | $35.40 Million | ▼ -87.8% |
| 1996 | 165.37x | $496.10 Million | $3.00 Million | — |