Tri Continental Closed Fund Financial Flexibility Index
Tri Continental Closed Fund financial flexibility index. Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) has a Financial Flexibility Index of -14.03x as of June 2022. Free cash flow of $-316.86 Million (operating CF $-316.86 Million minus capex $0.00) represents -14% of total liabilities ($22.58 Million). See free cash flow generation of Tri Continental Closed Fund to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Financial Flexibility Index of Tri Continental Closed Fund (1996–2021)
Financial flexibility index of Tri Continental Closed Fund from 1996 to 2021. Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Tri Continental Closed Fund across 26 annual periods. Check Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tri Continental Closed Fund Financial Flexibility Index by Year (1996–2021)
Tri Continental Closed Fund financial flexibility index by year from 1996 to 2021. Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Tri Continental Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) cash flow conversion.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 139.97x | $435.70 Million | $435.70 Million | $3.11 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2020 | 98.84x | $197.96 Million | $197.96 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2019 | 156.17x | $341.30 Million | $341.30 Million | $2.19 Million | ▲ +1211.9% |
| 2018 | -14.05x | $-73.45 Million | $-73.45 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -111.1% |
| 2017 | 126.32x | $280.96 Million | $280.96 Million | $2.22 Million | ▲ +886.8% |
| 2016 | 12.80x | $185.42 Million | $185.42 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +303.2% |
| 2015 | -6.30x | $-32.23 Million | $-32.23 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -136.1% |
| 2014 | 17.43x | $146.04 Million | $146.04 Million | $8.38 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 2013 | 54.29x | $313.40 Million | $313.40 Million | $5.77 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2012 | 33.61x | $164.70 Million | $164.70 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +4784.6% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $68.40 Million | $68.40 Million | $99.40 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2010 | 1.96x | $162.70 Million | $162.70 Million | $82.80 Million | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2009 | 0.88x | $172.30 Million | $172.30 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2008 | -14.12x | $-1.00 Billion | $-1.00 Billion | $70.88 Million | ▼ -4426.2% |
| 2007 | -0.31x | $-19.00 Million | $-19.00 Million | $60.91 Million | ▼ -100.3% |
| 2006 | 93.90x | $386.70 Million | $386.70 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +3007.3% |
| 2005 | 3.02x | $41.10 Million | $41.10 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2004 | 12.56x | $276.40 Million | $276.40 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2003 | 133.54x | $467.40 Million | $467.40 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2002 | -193.10x | $-753.10 Million | $-753.10 Million | $3.90 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2001 | -77.56x | $-372.30 Million | $-372.30 Million | $4.80 Million | ▼ -751.4% |
| 2000 | -9.11x | $-381.70 Million | $-381.70 Million | $41.90 Million | ▼ -112.3% |
| 1999 | 73.80x | $376.40 Million | $376.40 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 1998 | 220.24x | $814.90 Million | $814.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +987.5% |
| 1997 | 20.25x | $716.90 Million | $716.90 Million | $35.40 Million | ▼ -87.8% |
| 1996 | 165.37x | $496.10 Million | $496.10 Million | $3.00 Million | — |