Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) — Financial Flexibility Index
Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) has a Financial Flexibility Index of -14.03x as of June 2022. Free cash flow of $-316.86 Million (operating CF $-316.86 Million minus capex $0.00) represents -14% of total liabilities ($22.58 Million). Also explore TY shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Tri Continental Closed Fund Financial Flexibility Index (1996–2021)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Tri Continental Closed Fund across 26 annual periods. Check TY strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Tri Continental Closed Fund (1996–2021)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Tri Continental Closed Fund. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) market capitalisation.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 139.97x | $435.70 Million | $435.70 Million | $3.11 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2020 | 98.84x | $197.96 Million | $197.96 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2019 | 156.17x | $341.30 Million | $341.30 Million | $2.19 Million | ▲ +1211.9% |
| 2018 | -14.05x | $-73.45 Million | $-73.45 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -111.1% |
| 2017 | 126.32x | $280.96 Million | $280.96 Million | $2.22 Million | ▲ +886.8% |
| 2016 | 12.80x | $185.42 Million | $185.42 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +303.2% |
| 2015 | -6.30x | $-32.23 Million | $-32.23 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -136.1% |
| 2014 | 17.43x | $146.04 Million | $146.04 Million | $8.38 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 2013 | 54.29x | $313.40 Million | $313.40 Million | $5.77 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2012 | 33.61x | $164.70 Million | $164.70 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +4784.6% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $68.40 Million | $68.40 Million | $99.40 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2010 | 1.96x | $162.70 Million | $162.70 Million | $82.80 Million | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2009 | 0.88x | $172.30 Million | $172.30 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2008 | -14.12x | $-1.00 Billion | $-1.00 Billion | $70.88 Million | ▼ -4426.2% |
| 2007 | -0.31x | $-19.00 Million | $-19.00 Million | $60.91 Million | ▼ -100.3% |
| 2006 | 93.90x | $386.70 Million | $386.70 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +3007.3% |
| 2005 | 3.02x | $41.10 Million | $41.10 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2004 | 12.56x | $276.40 Million | $276.40 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2003 | 133.54x | $467.40 Million | $467.40 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2002 | -193.10x | $-753.10 Million | $-753.10 Million | $3.90 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2001 | -77.56x | $-372.30 Million | $-372.30 Million | $4.80 Million | ▼ -751.4% |
| 2000 | -9.11x | $-381.70 Million | $-381.70 Million | $41.90 Million | ▼ -112.3% |
| 1999 | 73.80x | $376.40 Million | $376.40 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 1998 | 220.24x | $814.90 Million | $814.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +987.5% |
| 1997 | 20.25x | $716.90 Million | $716.90 Million | $35.40 Million | ▼ -87.8% |
| 1996 | 165.37x | $496.10 Million | $496.10 Million | $3.00 Million | — |