Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($1.90 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Tri Continental Closed Fund equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tri Continental Closed Fund Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2024)
This chart shows how Tri Continental Closed Fund's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $1.90 Billion with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. Check Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Tri Continental Closed Fund (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Tri Continental Closed Fund from 1996 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Tri Continental Closed Fund worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | $1.90 Billion | $0.00 | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.75 Billion | $0.00 | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $1.61 Billion | $0.00 | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $2.04 Billion | $0.00 | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $1.78 Billion | $0.00 | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $1.70 Billion | $0.00 | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $1.47 Billion | $0.00 | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $1.68 Billion | $0.00 | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $1.51 Billion | $0.00 | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $1.42 Billion | $0.00 | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $1.55 Billion | $0.00 | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $1.47 Billion | $0.00 | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $1.22 Billion | $0.00 | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $1.12 Billion | $0.00 | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $1.10 Billion | $0.00 | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $983.90 Million | $0.00 | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $931.54 Million | $0.00 | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $2.41 Billion | $0.00 | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $2.69 Billion | $0.00 | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $2.43 Billion | $0.00 | $2.44 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $2.51 Billion | $0.00 | $2.53 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $2.35 Billion | $0.00 | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $2.00 Billion | $0.00 | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $2.91 Billion | $0.00 | $2.92 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $3.50 Billion | $0.00 | $3.54 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $4.15 Billion | $0.00 | $4.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $4.04 Billion | $0.00 | $4.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $3.43 Billion | $0.00 | $3.46 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $2.87 Billion | $0.00 | $2.88 Billion | — |