Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) — Long-term Investment Intensity

Latest as of June 2025: 99.2%

Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) has a Long-term Investment Intensity of 99.2% as of June 2025. Long-term investments of $1.89 Billion represent 99.2% of total assets of $1.90 Billion. A higher ratio indicates a company with significant capital committed to long-duration strategic positions. See TY working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.

LT Investment Intensity

99.2%
LT Investments / Total Assets

Long-term Investments

$1.89 Billion
USD

Total Assets

$1.90 Billion
USD

Country

USA
NYSE

Tri Continental Closed Fund Long-term Investment Intensity (2006–2024)

This chart shows how Tri Continental Closed Fund's Long-term Investment Intensity has evolved across 14 annual periods from 2006 to 2024. As of June 2025, the intensity stands at 99.2%, reflecting long-term investments of $1.89 Billion against total assets of $1.90 Billion USD. See TY defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.

Annual Long-term Investment Intensity for Tri Continental Closed Fund (2006–2024)

The table below presents the year-by-year Long-term Investment Intensity for Tri Continental Closed Fund from 2006 to 2024, covering 14 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, long-term investments, the intensity percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Tri Continental Closed Fund assets under control.

Year LT Investment Intensity LT Investments (USD) Total Assets Change (pp)
2024 99.4% $1.89 Billion $1.91 Billion ▲ +0.5 pp
2023 99.0% $1.74 Billion $1.75 Billion ▼ -0.4 pp
2022 99.4% $1.61 Billion $1.62 Billion ▼ -0.2 pp
2021 99.6% $2.04 Billion $2.05 Billion ▲ +0.2 pp
2020 99.4% $1.77 Billion $1.78 Billion ▼ 0.0 pp
2019 99.5% $1.70 Billion $1.71 Billion ▲ +0.3 pp
2018 99.1% $1.46 Billion $1.47 Billion ▼ -0.3 pp
2017 99.4% $1.67 Billion $1.68 Billion ▲ +0.9 pp
2016 98.5% $1.50 Billion $1.52 Billion ▼ -0.5 pp
2015 99.0% $1.41 Billion $1.43 Billion ▲ +0.1 pp
2014 98.9% $1.54 Billion $1.56 Billion ▲ +7.4 pp
2008 91.5% $917.16 Million $1.00 Billion ▼ -2.2 pp
2007 93.7% $2.32 Billion $2.47 Billion ▲ +4.3 pp
2006 89.4% $2.41 Billion $2.70 Billion —
pp = percentage points