Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) — Net Asset Quality Index
Tri Continental Closed Fund (TY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 99.9% as of June 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $1.90 Billion minus total liabilities of $1.92 Million yields net assets of $1.90 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Tri Continental Closed Fund asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Tri Continental Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1996–2024)
This chart shows how Tri Continental Closed Fund's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of June 2025, the index stands at 99.9%, representing net assets of $1.90 Billion against total assets of $1.90 Billion USD. See TY working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Tri Continental Closed Fund (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Tri Continental Closed Fund from 1996 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see TY market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99.8% | $1.90 Billion | $1.91 Billion | $4.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 99.7% | $1.75 Billion | $1.75 Billion | $4.42 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.9% | $1.61 Billion | $1.62 Billion | $1.78 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 99.8% | $2.04 Billion | $2.05 Billion | $3.11 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 99.9% | $1.78 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $2.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 99.9% | $1.70 Billion | $1.71 Billion | $2.19 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 99.6% | $1.47 Billion | $1.47 Billion | $5.23 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 99.9% | $1.68 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $2.22 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2016 | 99.0% | $1.51 Billion | $1.52 Billion | $14.49 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2015 | 99.6% | $1.42 Billion | $1.43 Billion | $5.12 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2014 | 99.5% | $1.55 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $8.38 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.6% | $1.47 Billion | $1.48 Billion | $5.77 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.6% | $1.22 Billion | $1.23 Billion | $4.90 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2011 | 91.8% | $1.12 Billion | $1.22 Billion | $99.40 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 93.0% | $1.10 Billion | $1.18 Billion | $82.80 Million | ▲ +9.6 pp |
| 2009 | 83.4% | $983.90 Million | $1.18 Billion | $195.70 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2008 | 92.9% | $931.54 Million | $1.00 Billion | $70.88 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2007 | 97.5% | $2.41 Billion | $2.47 Billion | $60.91 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2006 | 99.8% | $2.69 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $4.12 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2005 | 99.4% | $2.43 Billion | $2.44 Billion | $13.60 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2004 | 99.1% | $2.51 Billion | $2.53 Billion | $22.00 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2003 | 99.9% | $2.35 Billion | $2.35 Billion | $3.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 99.8% | $2.00 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $3.90 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 99.8% | $2.91 Billion | $2.92 Billion | $4.80 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2000 | 98.8% | $3.50 Billion | $3.54 Billion | $41.90 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 1999 | 99.9% | $4.15 Billion | $4.15 Billion | $5.10 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 99.9% | $4.04 Billion | $4.04 Billion | $3.70 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 1997 | 99.0% | $3.43 Billion | $3.46 Billion | $35.40 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 1996 | 99.9% | $2.87 Billion | $2.88 Billion | $3.00 Million | — |