Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $154.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.18 Billion) in one year. Explore Universal Insurance Holdings Inc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Insurance Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Insurance Holdings Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore Universal Insurance Holdings Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Insurance Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $381.49 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +199.6% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $137.36 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $70.97 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $324.51 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $234.38 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +543.0% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $29.35 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $84.60 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $230.10 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $245.01 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $121.40 Million | $688.82 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $219.27 Million | $700.46 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $123.35 Million | $692.86 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $156.96 Million | $744.48 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $142.00 Million | $762.22 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $110.13 Million | $744.02 Million | ▲ +1104.0% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-9.24 Million | $626.44 Million | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $37.79 Million | $564.97 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $52.84 Million | $443.08 Million | ▲ +9179.6% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $537.34K | $418.16 Million | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $153.38 Million | $459.56 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $26.97 Million | $171.08 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $15.89 Million | $110.67 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.59 Million | $31.76 Million | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-8.52 Million | $29.70 Million | ▼ -488.6% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $1.93 Million | $26.13 Million | ▲ +135.6% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-4.80 Million | $23.17 Million | ▼ -190.1% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $4.90 Million | $21.30 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $8.40 Million | $19.30 Million | ▲ +230.6% |
| 1997 | -0.33x | $-500.00K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 1996 | -0.31x | $-400.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.31x | $-400.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 1994 | -0.33x | $-400.00K | $1.20 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1993 | -0.56x | $-1.00 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 1992 | -1.14x | $-1.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -226.5% |
| 1991 | -0.35x | $-700.00K | $2.00 Million | — |