Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $154.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.18 Billion) in one year. See Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Insurance Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Insurance Holdings Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Universal Insurance Holdings Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Insurance Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $381.49 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +199.6% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $137.36 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $70.97 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $324.51 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $234.38 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +543.0% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $29.35 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $84.60 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $230.10 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $245.01 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $121.40 Million | $688.82 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $219.27 Million | $700.46 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $123.35 Million | $692.86 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $156.96 Million | $744.48 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $142.00 Million | $762.22 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $110.13 Million | $744.02 Million | ▲ +1104.0% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-9.24 Million | $626.44 Million | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $37.79 Million | $564.97 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $52.84 Million | $443.08 Million | ▲ +9179.6% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $537.34K | $418.16 Million | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $153.38 Million | $459.56 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $26.97 Million | $171.08 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $15.89 Million | $110.67 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.59 Million | $31.76 Million | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-8.52 Million | $29.70 Million | ▼ -488.6% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $1.93 Million | $26.13 Million | ▲ +135.6% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-4.80 Million | $23.17 Million | ▼ -190.1% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $4.90 Million | $21.30 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $8.40 Million | $19.30 Million | ▲ +230.6% |
| 1997 | -0.33x | $-500.00K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 1996 | -0.31x | $-400.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.31x | $-400.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 1994 | -0.33x | $-400.00K | $1.20 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1993 | -0.56x | $-1.00 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 1992 | -1.14x | $-1.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -226.5% |
| 1991 | -0.35x | $-700.00K | $2.00 Million | — |