Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.08x

Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd (2101) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$2.50 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$30.80 Billion) in one year. Check Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.08x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$2.50 Billion
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$30.80 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd (2000–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd across 26 annual periods. Check 2101 cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)

Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nankang Rubber Tire Corp Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 2101 cash flow metrics.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.04x NT$1.83 Billion NT$41.61 Billion ▲ +273.8%
2024 -0.03x NT$-772.84 Million NT$30.57 Billion ▲ +71.6%
2023 -0.09x NT$-2.78 Billion NT$31.26 Billion ▲ +18.9%
2022 -0.11x NT$-2.96 Billion NT$27.01 Billion ▲ +0.1%
2021 -0.11x NT$-2.86 Billion NT$26.07 Billion ▼ -269.3%
2020 0.06x NT$1.38 Billion NT$21.24 Billion ▼ -74.2%
2019 0.25x NT$4.26 Billion NT$16.93 Billion ▲ +204.3%
2018 0.08x NT$1.08 Billion NT$13.04 Billion ▲ +41.4%
2017 0.06x NT$751.78 Million NT$12.85 Billion ▼ -46.1%
2016 0.11x NT$1.23 Billion NT$11.28 Billion ▲ +1861.2%
2015 0.01x NT$62.81 Million NT$11.34 Billion ▼ -97.2%
2014 0.20x NT$1.81 Billion NT$9.18 Billion ▼ -45.0%
2013 0.36x NT$3.26 Billion NT$9.10 Billion ▲ +125.8%
2012 0.16x NT$1.62 Billion NT$10.20 Billion ▲ +407.9%
2011 -0.05x NT$-617.63 Million NT$11.98 Billion ▼ -151.4%
2010 0.10x NT$814.37 Million NT$8.11 Billion ▼ -68.6%
2009 0.32x NT$2.19 Billion NT$6.84 Billion ▲ +1841.8%
2008 -0.02x NT$-143.59 Million NT$7.83 Billion ▼ -108.9%
2007 0.20x NT$1.24 Billion NT$6.03 Billion ▼ -13.6%
2006 0.24x NT$1.62 Billion NT$6.82 Billion ▼ -1.5%
2005 0.24x NT$1.62 Billion NT$6.71 Billion ▲ +88.4%
2004 0.13x NT$821.58 Million NT$6.42 Billion ▲ +88.6%
2003 0.07x NT$376.04 Million NT$5.55 Billion ▲ +125.4%
2002 0.03x NT$231.44 Million NT$7.69 Billion ▼ -58.1%
2001 0.07x NT$607.52 Million NT$8.46 Billion ▲ +55.3%
2000 0.05x NT$408.25 Million NT$8.83 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.