Lu Thai Textile (200726) — Net Asset Quality Index
Lu Thai Textile (200726) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 72.6% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of HK$14.02 Billion minus total liabilities of HK$3.84 Billion yields net assets of HK$10.19 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See 200726 defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Lu Thai Textile Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1994–2025)
This chart shows how Lu Thai Textile's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 32 annual periods from 1994 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 72.6%, representing net assets of HK$10.19 Billion against total assets of HK$14.02 Billion HKD. Explore Lu Thai Textile cash conversion from operations to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Lu Thai Textile (1994–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Lu Thai Textile from 1994 to 2025, covering 32 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market cap of Lu Thai Textile.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (HKD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 71.8% | HK$10.13 Billion | HK$14.11 Billion | HK$3.98 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2024 | 70.5% | HK$9.82 Billion | HK$13.93 Billion | HK$4.11 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2023 | 71.6% | HK$9.62 Billion | HK$13.43 Billion | HK$3.81 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2022 | 70.5% | HK$9.41 Billion | HK$13.35 Billion | HK$3.94 Billion | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2021 | 64.4% | HK$8.37 Billion | HK$12.99 Billion | HK$4.62 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2020 | 66.7% | HK$8.09 Billion | HK$12.13 Billion | HK$4.04 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2019 | 69.8% | HK$8.30 Billion | HK$11.89 Billion | HK$3.59 Billion | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2018 | 73.3% | HK$7.73 Billion | HK$10.54 Billion | HK$2.81 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2017 | 76.4% | HK$7.78 Billion | HK$10.17 Billion | HK$2.40 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2016 | 78.8% | HK$7.41 Billion | HK$9.41 Billion | HK$1.99 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2015 | 80.0% | HK$7.28 Billion | HK$9.09 Billion | HK$1.81 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2014 | 81.3% | HK$7.02 Billion | HK$8.63 Billion | HK$1.61 Billion | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2013 | 76.3% | HK$6.41 Billion | HK$8.41 Billion | HK$2.00 Billion | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2012 | 69.4% | HK$5.65 Billion | HK$8.15 Billion | HK$2.50 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 70.6% | HK$5.47 Billion | HK$7.75 Billion | HK$2.28 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2010 | 67.6% | HK$4.74 Billion | HK$7.02 Billion | HK$2.27 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2009 | 66.4% | HK$4.19 Billion | HK$6.30 Billion | HK$2.12 Billion | ▲ +13.1 pp |
| 2008 | 53.3% | HK$3.78 Billion | HK$7.09 Billion | HK$3.31 Billion | ▲ +10.6 pp |
| 2007 | 42.7% | HK$2.50 Billion | HK$5.87 Billion | HK$3.36 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 42.9% | HK$2.14 Billion | HK$4.99 Billion | HK$2.85 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 43.8% | HK$1.93 Billion | HK$4.42 Billion | HK$2.48 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 43.8% | HK$1.75 Billion | HK$3.99 Billion | HK$2.24 Billion | ▼ -16.0 pp |
| 2003 | 59.8% | HK$1.55 Billion | HK$2.59 Billion | HK$1.04 Billion | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2002 | 72.6% | HK$1.30 Billion | HK$1.79 Billion | HK$492.29 Million | ▼ -13.3 pp |
| 2001 | 85.9% | HK$1.28 Billion | HK$1.49 Billion | HK$210.03 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2000 | 85.7% | HK$1.22 Billion | HK$1.42 Billion | HK$202.44 Million | ▲ +30.4 pp |
| 1999 | 55.3% | HK$337.41 Million | HK$610.00 Million | HK$272.59 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 55.3% | HK$321.93 Million | HK$582.12 Million | HK$260.18 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 1997 | 53.9% | HK$319.30 Million | HK$592.54 Million | HK$273.24 Million | ▲ +20.5 pp |
| 1996 | 33.4% | HK$161.07 Million | HK$482.28 Million | HK$321.21 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 1995 | 33.5% | HK$162.43 Million | HK$484.59 Million | HK$322.17 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 1994 | 38.2% | HK$162.37 Million | HK$425.60 Million | HK$263.23 Million | — |