Community Health Systems Inc (CYH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Community Health Systems Inc (CYH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 69.4% as of September 2017. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($563.00 Million) from net assets ($1.84 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See CYH current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Community Health Systems Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2016)
This chart shows how Community Health Systems Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 1999 to 2016. As of September 2017, the ratio stands at 69.4%, reflecting net assets of $1.84 Billion with intangible assets of $563.00 Million USD. See CYH defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Community Health Systems Inc (1999–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Community Health Systems Inc from 1999 to 2016, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Community Health Systems Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 70.5% | $2.28 Billion | $674.00 Million | $21.94 Billion | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2015 | 80.3% | $4.68 Billion | $923.00 Million | $26.86 Billion | ▼ -16.1 pp |
| 2014 | 96.3% | $4.61 Billion | $170.00 Million | $27.42 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2013 | 98.0% | $3.49 Billion | $70.10 Million | $17.12 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 97.6% | $3.16 Billion | $74.40 Million | $16.61 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 97.3% | $2.86 Billion | $77.50 Million | $15.21 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 96.9% | $2.64 Billion | $80.50 Million | $14.70 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2009 | 95.5% | $2.02 Billion | $91.40 Million | $14.02 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 95.5% | $2.00 Billion | $89.30 Million | $13.82 Billion | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2007 | 91.3% | $2.08 Billion | $181.00 Million | $13.49 Billion | ▲ +69.3 pp |
| 2006 | 22.0% | $1.72 Billion | $1.34 Billion | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 19.0% | $1.56 Billion | $1.27 Billion | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2004 | 2.1% | $1.24 Billion | $1.21 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2003 | 14.4% | $1.35 Billion | $1.16 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2002 | 15.2% | $1.21 Billion | $1.03 Billion | $2.81 Billion | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2001 | 10.3% | $1.12 Billion | $1.00 Billion | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +40.6 pp |
| 2000 | -30.3% | $756.17 Million | $985.57 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +251.8 pp |
| 1999 | -282.2% | $229.71 Million | $877.89 Million | $1.90 Billion | — |