Community Health Systems Inc (CYH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Community Health Systems Inc (CYH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 69.4% as of September 2017. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($563.00 Million) from net assets ($1.84 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore CYH net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Community Health Systems Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2016)
This chart shows how Community Health Systems Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 1999 to 2016. As of September 2017, the ratio stands at 69.4%, reflecting net assets of $1.84 Billion with intangible assets of $563.00 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Community Health Systems Inc market capitalisation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Community Health Systems Inc (1999–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Community Health Systems Inc from 1999 to 2016, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore Community Health Systems Inc (CYH) reinvestment ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 70.5% | $2.28 Billion | $674.00 Million | $21.94 Billion | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2015 | 80.3% | $4.68 Billion | $923.00 Million | $26.86 Billion | ▼ -16.1 pp |
| 2014 | 96.3% | $4.61 Billion | $170.00 Million | $27.42 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2013 | 98.0% | $3.49 Billion | $70.10 Million | $17.12 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 97.6% | $3.16 Billion | $74.40 Million | $16.61 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 97.3% | $2.86 Billion | $77.50 Million | $15.21 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 96.9% | $2.64 Billion | $80.50 Million | $14.70 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2009 | 95.5% | $2.02 Billion | $91.40 Million | $14.02 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 95.5% | $2.00 Billion | $89.30 Million | $13.82 Billion | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2007 | 91.3% | $2.08 Billion | $181.00 Million | $13.49 Billion | ▲ +69.3 pp |
| 2006 | 22.0% | $1.72 Billion | $1.34 Billion | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 19.0% | $1.56 Billion | $1.27 Billion | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2004 | 2.1% | $1.24 Billion | $1.21 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2003 | 14.4% | $1.35 Billion | $1.16 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2002 | 15.2% | $1.21 Billion | $1.03 Billion | $2.81 Billion | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2001 | 10.3% | $1.12 Billion | $1.00 Billion | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +40.6 pp |
| 2000 | -30.3% | $756.17 Million | $985.57 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +251.8 pp |
| 1999 | -282.2% | $229.71 Million | $877.89 Million | $1.90 Billion | — |