Herbalife Nutrition Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd tangible net worth ratio. Herbalife Nutrition Ltd (HLF) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -41.6% as of September 2017. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($310.10 Million) from net assets ($219.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Herbalife Nutrition Ltd (HLF) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Herbalife Nutrition Ltd (2000–2016)
Tangible net worth ratio of Herbalife Nutrition Ltd from 2000 to 2016. This chart shows how Herbalife Nutrition Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 15 annual periods from 2000 to 2016. As of September 2017, the ratio stands at -41.6%, reflecting net assets of $219.00 Million with intangible assets of $310.10 Million USD. See HLF current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2016)
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2016. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Herbalife Nutrition Ltd from 2000 to 2016, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Herbalife Nutrition Ltd (HLF) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | -58.0% | $196.30 Million | $310.10 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▼ -101.6 pp |
| 2013 | 43.6% | $551.45 Million | $310.80 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +17.6 pp |
| 2012 | 26.0% | $420.75 Million | $311.19 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -18.3 pp |
| 2011 | 44.3% | $560.19 Million | $311.76 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2010 | 36.2% | $487.21 Million | $310.89 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +23.0 pp |
| 2009 | 13.2% | $359.31 Million | $311.78 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +41.5 pp |
| 2008 | -28.3% | $241.73 Million | $310.06 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +41.9 pp |
| 2007 | -70.1% | $182.24 Million | $310.06 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -82.0 pp |
| 2006 | 11.9% | $353.89 Million | $311.81 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +98.4 pp |
| 2005 | -86.5% | $168.89 Million | $314.91 Million | $837.80 Million | ▲ +585.2 pp |
| 2004 | -671.7% | $64.34 Million | $496.53 Million | $948.70 Million | ▼ -565.3 pp |
| 2003 | -106.4% | $237.79 Million | $490.74 Million | $903.96 Million | ▲ +69.1 pp |
| 2002 | -175.5% | $191.27 Million | $526.92 Million | $855.71 Million | ▼ -274.1 pp |
| 2001 | 98.7% | $262.59 Million | $3.54 Million | $470.33 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 98.7% | $224.62 Million | $2.94 Million | $416.94 Million | — |