Travel + Leisure Co (TNL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Travel + Leisure Co (TNL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -66.9% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.08 Billion) from net assets ($650.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See shareholders equity of Travel + Leisure Co for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Travel + Leisure Co Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2017)
This chart shows how Travel + Leisure Co's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2001 to 2017. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at -66.9%, reflecting net assets of $650.00 Million with intangible assets of $1.08 Billion USD. Also explore how fast is Travel + Leisure Co growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Travel + Leisure Co (2001–2017)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Travel + Leisure Co from 2001 to 2017, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Travel + Leisure Co (TNL) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | -22.8% | $883.00 Million | $1.08 Billion | $10.40 Billion | ▲ +34.2 pp |
| 2016 | -57.0% | $718.00 Million | $1.13 Billion | $9.82 Billion | ▼ -39.1 pp |
| 2015 | -17.8% | $953.00 Million | $1.12 Billion | $9.72 Billion | ▼ -29.2 pp |
| 2014 | 11.4% | $1.26 Billion | $1.11 Billion | $9.68 Billion | ▼ -17.7 pp |
| 2013 | 29.1% | $1.62 Billion | $1.15 Billion | $9.74 Billion | ▼ -9.3 pp |
| 2012 | 38.4% | $1.93 Billion | $1.19 Billion | $9.46 Billion | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2011 | 49.3% | $2.23 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $9.02 Billion | ▼ -25.6 pp |
| 2010 | 74.9% | $2.92 Billion | $731.00 Million | $9.42 Billion | ▲ +14.0 pp |
| 2009 | 60.9% | $2.69 Billion | $1.05 Billion | $9.35 Billion | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2008 | 54.0% | $2.34 Billion | $1.08 Billion | $9.57 Billion | ▼ -16.5 pp |
| 2007 | 70.5% | $3.52 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 70.8% | $3.56 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $9.52 Billion | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2005 | 80.3% | $5.03 Billion | $992.00 Million | $9.17 Billion | ▼ -19.7 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $4.68 Billion | $0.00 | $8.34 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $4.28 Billion | $0.00 | $7.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $3.86 Billion | $0.00 | $5.51 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $2.57 Billion | $0.00 | $3.60 Billion | — |