Berry Petroleum Corp Asset Resilience Ratio
Berry Petroleum Corp asset resilience ratio. Berry Petroleum Corp (BRY) has an Asset Resilience Ratio of 0.54% as of June 2024. The Asset Resilience Ratio measures the percentage of a company's total assets that are held in liquid form (cash and short-term investments). This metric indicates how well-positioned the company is to handle unexpected financial challenges, economic downturns, or strategic opportunities without requiring external financing. See Berry Petroleum Corp (BRY) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Liquid Assets
Total Assets
Resilience Assessment
Asset Resilience Ratio of Berry Petroleum Corp (2000–2017)
Asset resilience ratio of Berry Petroleum Corp from 2000 to 2017. This chart shows how Berry Petroleum Corp's Asset Resilience Ratio has changed over time. Read how much debt does Berry Petroleum Corp carry for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Liquid Assets Composition Over Time
This chart breaks down Berry Petroleum Corp's liquid assets into cash & equivalents and short-term investments, showing how the composition has evolved over time. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Berry Petroleum Corp assets under control.
Current Liquid Assets Breakdown
| Component | Amount | % of Total Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $0.00 | 0% |
| Short-term Investments | $8.34 Million | 0.54% |
| Total Liquid Assets | $8.34 Million | 0.54% |
Asset Resilience Insights
- Limited Liquidity: Berry Petroleum Corp maintains only 0.54% of assets in liquid form.
- This low level may indicate efficient asset utilization but could pose risks during economic downturns.
- The company has significant short-term investments, indicating active treasury management.
Berry Petroleum Corp Industry Peers by Asset Resilience Ratio
Compare Berry Petroleum Corp's asset resilience ratio with other companies in the same industry.
| Company | Industry | Asset Resilience Ratio |
|---|---|---|
|
Aker BP ASA
OL:AKRBP |
Oil & Gas E&P | 7.04% |
|
Var Energi ASA
OL:VAR |
Oil & Gas E&P | 2.67% |
|
ARC Resources Ltd.
TO:ARX |
Oil & Gas E&P | 6.70% |
|
Range Resources Corp
NYSE:RRC |
Oil & Gas E&P | 0.00% |
|
MEG Energy Corp
TO:MEG |
Oil & Gas E&P | 0.00% |
|
Whitecap Resources Inc.
TO:WCP |
Oil & Gas E&P | 0.35% |
|
Northern Oil & Gas Inc
NYSE:NOG |
Oil & Gas E&P | 0.26% |
|
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd
TO:TVE |
Oil & Gas E&P | 0.01% |
Berry Petroleum Corp Asset Resilience Ratio by Year (2000–2017)
Berry Petroleum Corp asset resilience ratio by year from 2000 to 2017. The table below shows the annual Asset Resilience Ratio data for Berry Petroleum Corp.
| Year | Asset Resilience Ratio (%) | Liquid Assets | Total Assets | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-31 | 2.25% | $34.83 Million | $1.55 Billion | +2.25pp |
| 2016-12-31 | 0.00% | $128.00K | $2.65 Billion | +0.00pp |
| 2012-12-31 | 0.00% | $125.00K | $3.33 Billion | +0.00pp |
| 2011-12-31 | 0.00% | $65.00K | $2.73 Billion | +0.00pp |
| 2010-12-31 | 0.00% | $65.00K | $2.84 Billion | 0.00pp |
| 2009-12-31 | 0.00% | $66.00K | $2.24 Billion | +0.00pp |
| 2008-12-31 | 0.00% | $66.00K | $2.54 Billion | 0.00pp |
| 2007-12-31 | 0.00% | $58.00K | $1.45 Billion | -0.05pp |
| 2006-12-31 | 0.06% | $665.00K | $1.20 Billion | -0.05pp |
| 2005-12-31 | 0.10% | $661.00K | $635.05 Million | -0.06pp |
| 2004-12-31 | 0.16% | $659.00K | $412.10 Million | -0.03pp |
| 2003-12-31 | 0.19% | $663.00K | $340.38 Million | -0.06pp |
| 2002-12-31 | 0.26% | $660.00K | $258.07 Million | +0.00pp |
| 2001-12-31 | 0.26% | $594.00K | $232.53 Million | +0.01pp |
| 2000-12-31 | 0.24% | $582.00K | $238.36 Million | -- |
About Berry Petroleum Corp
As of December 18, 2025, Berry Corporation was acquired by California Resources Corporation. Berry Corporation operates as an independent upstream energy company in the western United States. It operates through two segments, Exploration and Production (E&P); and Well Servicing and Abandonment. The E&P segment engages in the development and production of onshore, low geologic risk, and long-lived… Read more