Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($11.15 Million) in capital expenditures ($15.00K). Check HIFS tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Hingham Institution for Savings Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1988–2024)
This chart tracks Hingham Institution for Savings's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hingham Institution for Savings operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Hingham Institution for Savings (1988–2024)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Hingham Institution for Savings from 1988 to 2024. See Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $11.89 Million | $139.00K | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $19.75 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $55.85 Million | $2.53 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $59.01 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $45.59 Million | $1.53 Million | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $33.17 Million | $647.00K | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $35.87 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +235.6% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $27.44 Million | $256.00K | ▲ +139.3% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $25.14 Million | $98.00K | ▼ -87.9% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $20.22 Million | $649.00K | ▲ +358.7% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $18.15 Million | $127.00K | ▼ -95.2% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $15.92 Million | $2.34 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | $13.67 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $16.82 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $13.61 Million | $2.99 Million | ▲ +414.6% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $6.60 Million | $282.00K | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $6.15 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +176.9% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $5.25 Million | $328.00K | ▼ -69.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $5.02 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +606.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $6.99 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $6.97 Million | $343.00K | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.27 Million | $347.00K | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $7.17 Million | $382.00K | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $6.31 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +536.5% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $6.05 Million | $151.00K | ▼ -84.7% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $3.56 Million | $582.00K | ▼ -28.5% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $3.50 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $2.70 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +307.4% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $2.20 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -83.3% |
| 1995 | 0.27x | $3.30 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +218.2% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $3.50 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -14.3% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $1.00 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +42.5% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $570.00K | $40.00K | ▼ -98.8% |
| 1989 | 5.76x | $210.00K | $1.21 Million | ▲ +3615.4% |
| 1988 | 0.16x | $1.87 Million | $290.00K | — |