Hingham Institution for Savings Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings capital reinvestment ratio. Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($11.15 Million) in capital expenditures ($15.00K). Check total reinvestment intensity of Hingham Institution for Savings to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Hingham Institution for Savings (1988–2024)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Hingham Institution for Savings from 1988 to 2024. This chart tracks Hingham Institution for Savings's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 35 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Hingham Institution for Savings growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Hingham Institution for Savings Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1988–2024)
Hingham Institution for Savings capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1988 to 2024. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hingham Institution for Savings operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $11.89 Million | $139.00K | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $19.75 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $55.85 Million | $2.53 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $59.01 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $45.59 Million | $1.53 Million | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $33.17 Million | $647.00K | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $35.87 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +235.6% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $27.44 Million | $256.00K | ▲ +139.3% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $25.14 Million | $98.00K | ▼ -87.9% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $20.22 Million | $649.00K | ▲ +358.7% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $18.15 Million | $127.00K | ▼ -95.2% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $15.92 Million | $2.34 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | $13.67 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $16.82 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $13.61 Million | $2.99 Million | ▲ +414.6% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $6.60 Million | $282.00K | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $6.15 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +176.9% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $5.25 Million | $328.00K | ▼ -69.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $5.02 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +606.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $6.99 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $6.97 Million | $343.00K | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.27 Million | $347.00K | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $7.17 Million | $382.00K | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $6.31 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +536.5% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $6.05 Million | $151.00K | ▼ -84.7% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $3.56 Million | $582.00K | ▼ -28.5% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $3.50 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $2.70 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +307.4% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $2.20 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -83.3% |
| 1995 | 0.27x | $3.30 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +218.2% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $3.50 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -14.3% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $1.00 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +42.5% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $570.00K | $40.00K | ▼ -98.8% |
| 1989 | 5.76x | $210.00K | $1.21 Million | ▲ +3615.4% |
| 1988 | 0.16x | $1.87 Million | $290.00K | — |