Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.07 Billion) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Hingham Institution for Savings to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hingham Institution for Savings across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Hingham Institution for Savings.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hingham Institution for Savings (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hingham Institution for Savings. Check HIFS cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00x | $11.89 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $19.75 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $55.85 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $59.01 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $45.59 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $33.17 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $35.87 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $27.44 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $25.14 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $20.22 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $18.15 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $15.92 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $13.67 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $16.82 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $13.61 Million | $945.11 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $6.60 Million | $860.27 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $6.15 Million | $746.37 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $5.25 Million | $689.83 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $5.02 Million | $639.83 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $6.99 Million | $579.79 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.97 Million | $502.73 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $3.27 Million | $443.04 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $7.17 Million | $388.23 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.31 Million | $352.64 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $6.05 Million | $308.38 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $3.56 Million | $265.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $236.40 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $2.70 Million | $201.20 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.20 Million | $182.40 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $157.60 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $3.50 Million | $137.20 Million | ▲ +241.3% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $133.80 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $2.50 Million | $135.80 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $1.40 Million | $136.80 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $570.00K | $135.50 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $210.00K | $132.60 Million | — |