Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.07 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Hingham Institution for Savings generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hingham Institution for Savings across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Hingham Institution for Savings to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hingham Institution for Savings (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hingham Institution for Savings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hingham Institution for Savings market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00x | $11.89 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $19.75 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $55.85 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $59.01 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $45.59 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $33.17 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $35.87 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $27.44 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $25.14 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $20.22 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $18.15 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $15.92 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $13.67 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $16.82 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $13.61 Million | $945.11 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $6.60 Million | $860.27 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $6.15 Million | $746.37 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $5.25 Million | $689.83 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $5.02 Million | $639.83 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $6.99 Million | $579.79 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.97 Million | $502.73 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $3.27 Million | $443.04 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $7.17 Million | $388.23 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.31 Million | $352.64 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $6.05 Million | $308.38 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $3.56 Million | $265.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $236.40 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $2.70 Million | $201.20 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.20 Million | $182.40 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $157.60 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $3.50 Million | $137.20 Million | ▲ +241.3% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $133.80 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $2.50 Million | $135.80 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $1.40 Million | $136.80 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $570.00K | $135.50 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $210.00K | $132.60 Million | — |