Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.07 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Hingham Institution for Savings to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hingham Institution for Savings (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hingham Institution for Savings from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hingham Institution for Savings across 36 annual periods. Check HIFS cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Hingham Institution for Savings cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hingham Institution for Savings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00x | $11.89 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $19.75 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $55.85 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $59.01 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $45.59 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $33.17 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $35.87 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $27.44 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $25.14 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $20.22 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $18.15 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $15.92 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $13.67 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $16.82 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $13.61 Million | $945.11 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $6.60 Million | $860.27 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $6.15 Million | $746.37 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $5.25 Million | $689.83 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $5.02 Million | $639.83 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $6.99 Million | $579.79 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.97 Million | $502.73 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $3.27 Million | $443.04 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $7.17 Million | $388.23 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.31 Million | $352.64 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $6.05 Million | $308.38 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $3.56 Million | $265.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $236.40 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $2.70 Million | $201.20 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.20 Million | $182.40 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $157.60 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $3.50 Million | $137.20 Million | ▲ +241.3% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $133.80 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $2.50 Million | $135.80 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $1.40 Million | $136.80 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $570.00K | $135.50 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $210.00K | $132.60 Million | — |