Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.07 Billion) in one year. Explore Hingham Institution for Savings strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hingham Institution for Savings across 36 annual periods. Also explore Hingham Institution for Savings balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hingham Institution for Savings (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hingham Institution for Savings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hingham Institution for Savings market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00x | $11.89 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $19.75 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $55.85 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $59.01 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $45.59 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $33.17 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $35.87 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $27.44 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $25.14 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $20.22 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $18.15 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $15.92 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $13.67 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $16.82 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $13.61 Million | $945.11 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $6.60 Million | $860.27 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $6.15 Million | $746.37 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $5.25 Million | $689.83 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $5.02 Million | $639.83 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $6.99 Million | $579.79 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.97 Million | $502.73 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $3.27 Million | $443.04 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $7.17 Million | $388.23 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.31 Million | $352.64 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $6.05 Million | $308.38 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $3.56 Million | $265.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $236.40 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $2.70 Million | $201.20 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.20 Million | $182.40 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $157.60 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $3.50 Million | $137.20 Million | ▲ +241.3% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $133.80 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $2.50 Million | $135.80 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $1.40 Million | $136.80 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $570.00K | $135.50 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $210.00K | $132.60 Million | — |