Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow Quality Index
Hingham Institution for Savings cash flow quality index. Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.64x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $11.15 Million is below net income of $17.30 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See HIFS free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Hingham Institution for Savings (1988–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Hingham Institution for Savings from 1988 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Hingham Institution for Savings across 34 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore HIFS operating cash to total liabilities to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Hingham Institution for Savings Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1988–2024)
Hingham Institution for Savings cash flow quality index by year from 1988 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Hingham Institution for Savings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HIFS operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.42x | $11.89 Million | $28.19 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2023 | 0.75x | $19.75 Million | $26.37 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2022 | 1.49x | $55.85 Million | $37.52 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2021 | 0.87x | $59.01 Million | $67.46 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2020 | 0.90x | $45.59 Million | $50.77 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2019 | 0.85x | $33.17 Million | $38.93 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2018 | 1.18x | $35.87 Million | $30.40 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2017 | 1.07x | $27.44 Million | $25.76 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 1.07x | $25.14 Million | $23.42 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2015 | 1.05x | $20.22 Million | $19.35 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2014 | 0.82x | $18.15 Million | $22.26 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2013 | 1.19x | $15.92 Million | $13.37 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2012 | 1.03x | $13.67 Million | $13.29 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2011 | 1.39x | $16.82 Million | $12.06 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2010 | 1.33x | $13.61 Million | $10.23 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2009 | 0.82x | $6.60 Million | $8.04 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $6.15 Million | $6.29 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2007 | 1.17x | $5.25 Million | $4.49 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $5.02 Million | $4.64 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2005 | 1.13x | $6.99 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2004 | 1.20x | $6.97 Million | $5.82 Million | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2003 | 0.61x | $3.27 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2002 | 1.20x | $7.17 Million | $5.98 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2001 | 1.24x | $6.31 Million | $5.09 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2000 | 1.43x | $6.05 Million | $4.23 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1999 | 1.10x | $3.56 Million | $3.25 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 1998 | 1.17x | $3.50 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | $2.70 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 1996 | 1.10x | $2.20 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 1995 | 1.74x | $3.30 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 1994 | 1.35x | $3.50 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 1993 | 5.00x | $1.00 Million | $200.00K | ▲ +220.0% |
| 1992 | 1.56x | $2.50 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 1988 | 2.25x | $1.87 Million | $830.00K | — |