Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -21.0% as of December 2025. Working capital of $-100.67 Million (current assets of $378.82 Million minus current liabilities of $479.49 Million) is measured against net assets of $479.71 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See net asset quality index of Hingham Institution for Savings to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Hingham Institution for Savings Working Capital to Net Assets (1991–2025)
This chart shows how Hingham Institution for Savings's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 35 annual periods from 1991 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at -21.0%, reflecting working capital of $-100.67 Million against net assets of $479.71 Million USD. Check Hingham Institution for Savings tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Hingham Institution for Savings (1991–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Hingham Institution for Savings from 1991 to 2025, covering 35 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see HIFS market cap overview.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -21.0% | $-100.67 Million | $479.71 Million | $378.82 Million | $479.49 Million | ▲ +633.7 pp |
| 2024 | -654.7% | $-2.83 Billion | $431.75 Million | $360.60 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -166.2 pp |
| 2023 | -488.5% | $-1.99 Billion | $407.62 Million | $371.03 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +66.1 pp |
| 2022 | -554.6% | $-2.14 Billion | $385.97 Million | $369.15 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +42.2 pp |
| 2021 | -596.8% | $-2.12 Billion | $354.61 Million | $276.63 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +51.8 pp |
| 2020 | -648.7% | $-1.90 Billion | $292.94 Million | $239.26 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -15.7 pp |
| 2019 | -632.9% | $-1.56 Billion | $247.22 Million | $257.08 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -33.2 pp |
| 2018 | -599.7% | $-1.27 Billion | $212.58 Million | $300.57 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2017 | -597.6% | $-1.11 Billion | $186.16 Million | $393.93 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +31.7 pp |
| 2016 | -629.3% | $-1.01 Billion | $161.02 Million | $353.63 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +27.6 pp |
| 2015 | -656.8% | $-906.54 Million | $138.01 Million | $311.09 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +23.1 pp |
| 2014 | -679.9% | $-826.24 Million | $121.52 Million | $263.68 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2013 | -694.5% | $-716.87 Million | $103.22 Million | $225.02 Million | $941.89 Million | ▲ +19.8 pp |
| 2012 | -714.3% | $-662.87 Million | $92.80 Million | $207.97 Million | $870.84 Million | ▼ -37.4 pp |
| 2011 | -676.9% | $-556.88 Million | $82.27 Million | $231.16 Million | $788.05 Million | ▲ +208.3 pp |
| 2010 | -885.2% | $-643.88 Million | $72.74 Million | $87.26 Million | $731.14 Million | ▼ -27.7 pp |
| 2009 | -857.6% | $-559.93 Million | $65.29 Million | $72.59 Million | $632.51 Million | ▼ -39.4 pp |
| 2008 | -818.2% | $-489.47 Million | $59.83 Million | $37.25 Million | $526.72 Million | ▼ -75.9 pp |
| 2007 | -742.3% | $-406.55 Million | $54.77 Million | $36.71 Million | $443.26 Million | ▲ +14.7 pp |
| 2006 | -756.9% | $-392.23 Million | $51.82 Million | $17.62 Million | $409.85 Million | ▲ +314.1 pp |
| 2005 | -1071.1% | $-519.01 Million | $48.46 Million | $16.39 Million | $535.41 Million | ▼ -99.0 pp |
| 2004 | -972.1% | $-430.85 Million | $44.32 Million | $13.93 Million | $444.78 Million | ▼ -144.9 pp |
| 2003 | -827.2% | $-338.42 Million | $40.91 Million | $13.29 Million | $351.71 Million | ▲ +79.2 pp |
| 2002 | -906.4% | $-346.25 Million | $38.20 Million | $36.56 Million | $382.81 Million | ▼ -205.1 pp |
| 2001 | -701.2% | $-235.17 Million | $33.54 Million | $44.10 Million | $279.28 Million | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2000 | -688.3% | $-203.05 Million | $29.50 Million | $23.29 Million | $226.34 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 1999 | -676.5% | $-177.11 Million | $26.18 Million | $17.63 Million | $194.74 Million | ▲ +97.8 pp |
| 1998 | -774.3% | $-183.50 Million | $23.70 Million | $19.90 Million | $203.40 Million | ▲ +117.3 pp |
| 1997 | -891.6% | $-190.80 Million | $21.40 Million | $8.50 Million | $199.30 Million | ▼ -13.5 pp |
| 1996 | -878.1% | $-168.60 Million | $19.20 Million | $12.70 Million | $181.30 Million | ▼ -65.2 pp |
| 1995 | -812.9% | $-144.70 Million | $17.80 Million | $11.60 Million | $156.30 Million | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 1994 | -825.6% | $-132.10 Million | $16.00 Million | $4.70 Million | $136.80 Million | ▲ +80.0 pp |
| 1993 | -905.7% | $-127.70 Million | $14.10 Million | $5.80 Million | $133.50 Million | ▲ +52.0 pp |
| 1992 | -957.7% | $-131.20 Million | $13.70 Million | $4.50 Million | $135.70 Million | ▲ +142.3 pp |
| 1991 | -1100.0% | $-132.00 Million | $12.00 Million | $4.90 Million | $136.90 Million | — |