Old Point Financial Corporation (OPOF) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Old Point Financial Corporation (OPOF) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($1.66 Million) in capital expenditures ($157.00K). Check OPOF tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Old Point Financial Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1992–2024)
This chart tracks Old Point Financial Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OPOF cash generation efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Old Point Financial Corporation (1992–2024)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Old Point Financial Corporation from 1992 to 2024. See cash generation quality of Old Point Financial Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | $14.64 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $11.00 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $17.57 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $23.18 Million | $1.51 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $12.37 Million | $1.78 Million | ▲ +266.3% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $12.15 Million | $478.00K | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $9.44 Million | $619.00K | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $8.65 Million | $891.00K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $7.83 Million | $1.76 Million | ▼ -40.9% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | $10.04 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2013 | 1.28x | $8.52 Million | $10.88 Million | ▲ +201.1% |
| 2012 | 0.42x | $9.78 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $9.39 Million | $2.46 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $2.83 Million | $1.16 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $7.95 Million | $1.68 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $8.11 Million | $2.15 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2006 | 0.74x | $9.05 Million | $6.73 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $9.18 Million | $4.14 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $9.24 Million | $5.66 Million | ▲ +117.9% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $7.88 Million | $2.21 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $4.21 Million | $833.00K | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $8.22 Million | $795.00K | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $6.24 Million | $2.09 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $7.01 Million | $3.52 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1998 | 0.66x | $5.43 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +177.8% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $5.46 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $6.11 Million | $2.11 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $4.39 Million | $1.99 Million | ▲ +1022.6% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $4.40 Million | $178.00K | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1993 | 0.37x | $2.88 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 1992 | 0.66x | $1.74 Million | $1.14 Million | — |