Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.48x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $3.47 Billion exceeds net income of $1.40 Billion, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Woodside Energy Group Ltd cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Woodside Energy Group Ltd Cash Flow Quality Index (1997–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Woodside Energy Group Ltd across 27 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check WDS total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Woodside Energy Group Ltd. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Woodside Energy Group Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.65x | $7.19 Billion | $2.72 Billion | ▲ +65.0% |
| 2024 | 1.60x | $5.85 Billion | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -56.7% |
| 2023 | 3.70x | $6.14 Billion | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +176.2% |
| 2022 | 1.34x | $8.81 Billion | $6.58 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2021 | 1.91x | $3.79 Billion | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2019 | 9.64x | $3.31 Billion | $343.00 Million | ▲ +298.8% |
| 2018 | 2.42x | $3.30 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2017 | 2.25x | $2.40 Billion | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2016 | 2.98x | $2.59 Billion | $868.00 Million | ▼ -96.9% |
| 2015 | 95.19x | $2.48 Billion | $26.00 Million | ▲ +4702.4% |
| 2014 | 1.98x | $4.79 Billion | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2013 | 1.90x | $3.33 Billion | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2012 | 1.21x | $3.49 Billion | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2011 | 1.47x | $2.24 Billion | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2010 | 1.34x | $2.10 Billion | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2009 | 1.01x | $1.52 Billion | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2008 | 1.77x | $2.65 Billion | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2007 | 2.34x | $2.48 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2006 | 1.24x | $1.77 Billion | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2005 | 1.18x | $1.31 Billion | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2004 | 1.22x | $1.03 Billion | $845.50 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | 2.28x | $905.22 Million | $396.36 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 2001 | 1.22x | $565.78 Million | $464.28 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2000 | 0.95x | $916.15 Million | $966.64 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 1999 | 1.68x | $363.30 Million | $216.70 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 1998 | 1.31x | $240.13 Million | $183.05 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 1997 | 1.84x | $328.54 Million | $178.82 Million | — |