Woodside Energy Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Woodside Energy Group Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.47 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($26.66 Billion) in one year. Check WDS total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Woodside Energy Group Ltd (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Woodside Energy Group Ltd from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Woodside Energy Group Ltd across 37 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Woodside Energy Group Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Woodside Energy Group Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Woodside Energy Group Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Woodside Energy Group Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $7.19 Billion | $26.66 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | $5.85 Billion | $25.11 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $6.14 Billion | $20.19 Billion | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2022 | 0.40x | $8.81 Billion | $22.19 Billion | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $3.79 Billion | $12.24 Billion | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $1.85 Billion | $11.75 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $3.31 Billion | $11.94 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $3.30 Billion | $8.77 Billion | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $2.40 Billion | $9.49 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | $2.59 Billion | $9.09 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $2.48 Billion | $8.81 Billion | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2014 | 0.64x | $4.79 Billion | $7.42 Billion | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2013 | 0.43x | $3.33 Billion | $7.81 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | $3.49 Billion | $9.26 Billion | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $2.24 Billion | $9.47 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $2.10 Billion | $8.51 Billion | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.52 Billion | $8.53 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 0.47x | $2.65 Billion | $5.59 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $2.48 Billion | $4.07 Billion | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | $1.77 Billion | $3.76 Billion | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $1.31 Billion | $2.54 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2004 | 0.55x | $1.03 Billion | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2003 | 0.51x | $905.22 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2002 | 0.45x | $674.58 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $565.78 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $916.15 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +132.8% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $363.30 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +33.5% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $240.13 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -44.4% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $328.54 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 1996 | 165.42x | $409.83 Million | $2.48 Million | ▲ +99224.6% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $247.45 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +17.8% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $219.06 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +22.7% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $172.21 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $146.71 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 1991 | 0.15x | $216.56 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +203.4% |
| 1990 | 0.05x | $69.68 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +32.0% |
| 1989 | 0.04x | $50.25 Million | $1.31 Billion | — |