Samsung Heavy Industries Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Samsung Heavy Industries cash flow-to-debt ratio. Samsung Heavy Industries (010140) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩818.13 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩13.25 Trillion) in one year. Check Samsung Heavy Industries earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Samsung Heavy Industries (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Samsung Heavy Industries from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Samsung Heavy Industries across 23 annual periods. Check 010140 cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Samsung Heavy Industries Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Samsung Heavy Industries cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Samsung Heavy Industries. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Samsung Heavy Industries operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (KRW) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | ₩1.56 Trillion | ₩10.85 Trillion | ▲ +195.8% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | ₩654.52 Billion | ₩13.45 Trillion | ▲ +214.8% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | ₩-516.47 Billion | ₩12.18 Trillion | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | ₩-1.69 Trillion | ₩10.92 Trillion | ▼ -247.5% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | ₩845.03 Billion | ₩8.04 Trillion | ▲ +496.6% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | ₩-243.90 Billion | ₩9.20 Trillion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | ₩-681.21 Billion | ₩8.35 Trillion | ▼ -471.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | ₩165.52 Billion | ₩7.54 Trillion | ▼ -67.4% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | ₩540.07 Billion | ₩8.02 Trillion | ▲ +147.4% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | ₩-1.55 Trillion | ₩10.94 Trillion | ▼ -398.6% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | ₩620.28 Billion | ₩13.04 Trillion | ▲ +220.1% |
| 2014 | -0.04x | ₩-457.46 Billion | ₩11.55 Trillion | ▼ -177.7% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | ₩590.22 Billion | ₩11.58 Trillion | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | ₩1.44 Trillion | ₩11.77 Trillion | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | ₩1.04 Trillion | ₩14.55 Trillion | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | ₩1.21 Trillion | ₩24.29 Trillion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | ₩1.44 Trillion | ₩8.91 Trillion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | ₩1.38 Trillion | ₩6.83 Trillion | ▲ +308.6% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | ₩244.15 Billion | ₩4.93 Trillion | ▼ -82.9% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | ₩1.48 Trillion | ₩5.11 Trillion | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2003 | 0.49x | ₩1.76 Trillion | ₩3.56 Trillion | ▲ +918.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | ₩159.98 Billion | ₩3.30 Trillion | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | ₩1.01 Trillion | ₩4.20 Trillion | — |