Urban One Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Urban One cash flow-to-debt ratio. Urban One (UONE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($532.28 Million) in one year. Check how high is Urban One's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Urban One (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Urban One from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Urban One across 29 annual periods. Check UONE total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Urban One Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Urban One cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Urban One. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see UONE cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $4.16 Million | $565.76 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $37.48 Million | $765.86 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $64.64 Million | $920.59 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $67.06 Million | $981.97 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $80.15 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $73.87 Million | $995.89 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $58.51 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $50.23 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $28.31 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $48.25 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $41.75 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $53.92 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $37.03 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $45.45 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $55.02 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +135.2% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $17.84 Million | $804.88 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $45.44 Million | $787.49 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $13.83 Million | $810.00 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $44.01 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $77.54 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $101.63 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | $123.72 Million | $782.70 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $109.72 Million | $739.45 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $70.82 Million | $740.34 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $59.78 Million | $870.97 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $55.69 Million | $708.15 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $18.20 Million | $107.20 Million | ▲ +177.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $9.30 Million | $152.10 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $4.94 Million | $101.21 Million | — |