Urban One Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Urban One tangible net worth ratio. Urban One (UONE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -20.6% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($23.19 Million) from net assets ($19.23 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Urban One growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Urban One (1998–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Urban One from 1998 to 2025. This chart shows how Urban One's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at -20.6%, reflecting net assets of $19.23 Million with intangible assets of $23.19 Million USD. Check Urban One PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Urban One Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Urban One tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Urban One from 1998 to 2025, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Urban One worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9.6% | $27.23 Million | $24.63 Million | $592.99 Million | ▲ +119.4 pp |
| 2024 | -109.8% | $178.93 Million | $375.49 Million | $944.79 Million | ▼ -35.4 pp |
| 2023 | -74.4% | $290.58 Million | $506.85 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2022 | -73.7% | $362.67 Million | $629.99 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +15.4 pp |
| 2021 | -89.1% | $322.33 Million | $609.50 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +113.2 pp |
| 2020 | -202.3% | $199.60 Million | $603.29 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +64.9 pp |
| 2019 | -267.2% | $193.64 Million | $711.03 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -199.5 pp |
| 2012 | -67.7% | $578.05 Million | $969.51 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +58.0 pp |
| 2011 | -125.7% | $430.94 Million | $972.82 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +144.1 pp |
| 2010 | -269.8% | $194.34 Million | $718.73 Million | $999.21 Million | ▼ -74.1 pp |
| 2009 | -195.8% | $248.05 Million | $733.70 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -39.7 pp |
| 2008 | -156.1% | $315.48 Million | $807.87 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -51.3 pp |
| 2007 | -104.7% | $636.99 Million | $1.30 Billion | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -26.0 pp |
| 2006 | -78.8% | $1.02 Billion | $1.82 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2005 | -80.0% | $1.02 Billion | $1.84 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -34.7 pp |
| 2004 | -45.4% | $1.33 Billion | $1.93 Billion | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2003 | -39.4% | $1.28 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2002 | -42.8% | $1.24 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +25.9 pp |
| 2001 | -68.7% | $1.05 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2000 | -54.9% | $1.06 Billion | $1.64 Billion | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -102.9 pp |
| 1999 | 48.0% | $420.30 Million | $218.50 Million | $527.50 Million | ▲ +7453.9 pp |
| 1998 | -7405.9% | $1.70 Million | $127.60 Million | $153.80 Million | — |