Eaton Vance California MIT Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eaton Vance California MIT cash flow-to-debt ratio. Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($40.48 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Eaton Vance California MIT to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Eaton Vance California MIT (2006–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Eaton Vance California MIT across 17 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Eaton Vance California MIT reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Eaton Vance California MIT Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2006–2025)
Eaton Vance California MIT cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2006 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eaton Vance California MIT. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eaton Vance California MIT cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $2.57 Million | $40.48 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | $9.43 Million | $26.88 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $13.12 Million | $32.69 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $21.71 Million | $44.24 Million | ▲ +5064.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $578.11K | $60.85 Million | ▼ -91.9% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $7.13 Million | $60.85 Million | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $4.18 Million | $59.81 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $2.66 Million | $60.18 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $7.25 Million | $54.34 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $4.85 Million | $59.02 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | $4.85 Million | $12.85 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $4.85 Million | $14.55 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $11.14 Million | $67.36 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $7.02 Million | $72.51 Million | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2008 | -1.67x | $-32.71 Million | $19.59 Million | ▼ -274.8% |
| 2007 | -0.45x | $-4.57 Million | $10.26 Million | ▼ -311.0% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $3.31 Million | $15.69 Million | — |