Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -1.4% as of November 2025. Working capital of $-1.09 Million (current assets of $1.52 Million minus current liabilities of $2.61 Million) is measured against net assets of $78.85 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See CEV free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Eaton Vance California MIT Working Capital to Net Assets (2010–2025)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MIT's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2010 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at -1.4%, reflecting working capital of $-1.09 Million against net assets of $78.85 Million USD. See Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Eaton Vance California MIT (2010–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Eaton Vance California MIT from 2010 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) total market value.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.4% | $-1.09 Million | $78.85 Million | $1.52 Million | $2.61 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2024 | -0.2% | $-142.75K | $83.07 Million | $112.66K | $255.41K | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 2.0% | $1.60 Million | $81.42 Million | $1.82 Million | $213.88K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 3.4% | $2.82 Million | $81.95 Million | $3.07 Million | $250.53K | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2021 | 2.4% | $2.52 Million | $104.47 Million | $3.64 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2020 | 3.9% | $4.08 Million | $104.79 Million | $5.35 Million | $1.27 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2019 | 1.9% | $1.92 Million | $102.19 Million | $2.16 Million | $241.43K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2018 | 1.0% | $921.82K | $93.70 Million | $1.74 Million | $814.26K | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 2.0% | $2.07 Million | $102.93 Million | $2.08 Million | $17.64K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2016 | 3.1% | $3.11 Million | $101.63 Million | $3.13 Million | $18.01K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2015 | 1.1% | $1.69 Million | $151.71 Million | $1.70 Million | $10.36K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 1.2% | $1.85 Million | $152.10 Million | $1.86 Million | $16.60K | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2013 | 4.7% | $6.63 Million | $141.31 Million | $6.65 Million | $17.81K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2012 | 1.1% | $1.21 Million | $106.37 Million | $2.45 Million | $1.24 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2011 | 10.7% | $9.58 Million | $89.86 Million | $9.71 Million | $132.48K | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2010 | 4.5% | $4.03 Million | $89.40 Million | $4.18 Million | $141.83K | — |