Eaton Vance California MIT Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Eaton Vance California MIT working capital to net assets ratio. Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -1.4% as of November 2025. Working capital of $-1.09 Million (current assets of $1.52 Million minus current liabilities of $2.61 Million) is measured against net assets of $78.85 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible equity quality of Eaton Vance California MIT to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Eaton Vance California MIT (2010–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Eaton Vance California MIT from 2010 to 2025. This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MIT's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2010 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at -1.4%, reflecting working capital of $-1.09 Million against net assets of $78.85 Million USD. See CEV days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Eaton Vance California MIT Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2010–2025)
Eaton Vance California MIT working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2010 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Eaton Vance California MIT from 2010 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see total assets of Eaton Vance California MIT.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.4% | $-1.09 Million | $78.85 Million | $1.52 Million | $2.61 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2024 | -0.2% | $-142.75K | $83.07 Million | $112.66K | $255.41K | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 2.0% | $1.60 Million | $81.42 Million | $1.82 Million | $213.88K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 3.4% | $2.82 Million | $81.95 Million | $3.07 Million | $250.53K | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2021 | 2.4% | $2.52 Million | $104.47 Million | $3.64 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2020 | 3.9% | $4.08 Million | $104.79 Million | $5.35 Million | $1.27 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2019 | 1.9% | $1.92 Million | $102.19 Million | $2.16 Million | $241.43K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2018 | 1.0% | $921.82K | $93.70 Million | $1.74 Million | $814.26K | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 2.0% | $2.07 Million | $102.93 Million | $2.08 Million | $17.64K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2016 | 3.1% | $3.11 Million | $101.63 Million | $3.13 Million | $18.01K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2015 | 1.1% | $1.69 Million | $151.71 Million | $1.70 Million | $10.36K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 1.2% | $1.85 Million | $152.10 Million | $1.86 Million | $16.60K | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2013 | 4.7% | $6.63 Million | $141.31 Million | $6.65 Million | $17.81K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2012 | 1.1% | $1.21 Million | $106.37 Million | $2.45 Million | $1.24 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2011 | 10.7% | $9.58 Million | $89.86 Million | $9.71 Million | $132.48K | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2010 | 4.5% | $4.03 Million | $89.40 Million | $4.18 Million | $141.83K | — |