Eaton Vance California MIT Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Eaton Vance California MIT strategic asset allocation index. Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 149.4% as of November 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $- plus long-term investments of $117.78 Million) total $117.78 Million, measured against net assets of $78.85 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See net asset quality index of Eaton Vance California MIT to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Eaton Vance California MIT (2006–2025)
Strategic asset allocation index of Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025. This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MIT's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of November 2025, the index stands at 149.4%, representing strategic assets of $117.78 Million against net assets of $78.85 Million USD. Check Eaton Vance California MIT tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Eaton Vance California MIT Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2006–2025)
Eaton Vance California MIT strategic asset allocation index by year from 2006 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CEV company net worth.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 149.4% | $117.78 Million | $- | $117.78 Million | $78.85 Million | ▲ +18.5 pp |
| 2024 | 130.9% | $108.71 Million | $- | $108.71 Million | $83.07 Million | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2023 | 137.9% | $112.27 Million | $- | $112.27 Million | $81.42 Million | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2022 | 150.2% | $123.12 Million | $- | $123.12 Million | $81.95 Million | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2021 | 154.8% | $161.67 Million | $- | $161.67 Million | $104.47 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2020 | 153.0% | $160.29 Million | $- | $160.29 Million | $104.79 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2019 | 156.4% | $159.83 Million | $- | $159.83 Million | $102.19 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2018 | 162.4% | $152.14 Million | $0.00 | $152.14 Million | $93.70 Million | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2017 | 150.8% | $155.19 Million | $0.00 | $155.19 Million | $102.93 Million | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2016 | 154.5% | $157.04 Million | $0.00 | $157.04 Million | $101.63 Million | ▲ +48.6 pp |
| 2015 | 105.9% | $160.64 Million | $0.00 | $160.64 Million | $151.71 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2014 | 106.9% | $162.53 Million | $- | $162.53 Million | $152.10 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2008 | 109.2% | $132.19 Million | $- | $132.19 Million | $121.04 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2007 | 104.1% | $174.49 Million | $- | $174.49 Million | $167.57 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 107.5% | $190.29 Million | $- | $190.29 Million | $176.99 Million | — |