Eaton Vance California MIT Financial Flexibility Index
Eaton Vance California MIT financial flexibility index. Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 0.03x as of November 2025. Free cash flow of $1.41 Million (operating CF $1.41 Million minus capex $3.00) represents 0% of total liabilities ($40.48 Million). See CEV cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Financial Flexibility Index of Eaton Vance California MIT (2006–2025)
Financial flexibility index of Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025. Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Eaton Vance California MIT across 17 annual periods. Check CEV operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Eaton Vance California MIT Financial Flexibility Index by Year (2006–2025)
Eaton Vance California MIT financial flexibility index by year from 2006 to 2025. Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Eaton Vance California MIT. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eaton Vance California MIT cash flow conversion.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $2.57 Million | $2.57 Million | $40.48 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | $9.43 Million | $9.43 Million | $26.88 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $13.12 Million | $13.12 Million | $32.69 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $21.71 Million | $21.71 Million | $44.24 Million | ▲ +5064.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $578.11K | $578.11K | $60.85 Million | ▼ -91.9% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $7.13 Million | $7.13 Million | $60.85 Million | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $4.18 Million | $4.18 Million | $59.81 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $2.66 Million | $2.66 Million | $60.18 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $7.25 Million | $7.25 Million | $54.34 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $4.85 Million | $4.85 Million | $59.02 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | $4.85 Million | $4.85 Million | $12.85 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $4.85 Million | $4.85 Million | $14.55 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $11.14 Million | $11.14 Million | $67.36 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $7.02 Million | $7.02 Million | $72.51 Million | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2008 | -1.67x | $-32.71 Million | $-32.71 Million | $19.59 Million | ▼ -274.8% |
| 2007 | -0.45x | $-4.57 Million | $-4.57 Million | $10.26 Million | ▼ -311.0% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $3.31 Million | $3.31 Million | $15.69 Million | — |