Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) — Long-term Investment Intensity
Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Long-term Investment Intensity of 98.7% as of November 2025. Long-term investments of $117.78 Million represent 98.7% of total assets of $119.33 Million. A higher ratio indicates a company with significant capital committed to long-duration strategic positions. See shareholders equity of Eaton Vance California MIT for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
LT Investment Intensity
Long-term Investments
Total Assets
Country
Eaton Vance California MIT Long-term Investment Intensity (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MIT's Long-term Investment Intensity has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of November 2025, the intensity stands at 98.7%, reflecting long-term investments of $117.78 Million against total assets of $119.33 Million USD. Also explore balance sheet size of Eaton Vance California MIT for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Long-term Investment Intensity for Eaton Vance California MIT (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Long-term Investment Intensity for Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, long-term investments, the intensity percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CEV market cap overview.
| Year | LT Investment Intensity | LT Investments (USD) | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 98.7% | $117.78 Million | $119.33 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2024 | 98.9% | $108.71 Million | $109.95 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2023 | 98.4% | $112.27 Million | $114.11 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2022 | 97.6% | $123.12 Million | $126.19 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2021 | 97.8% | $161.67 Million | $165.31 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2020 | 96.8% | $160.29 Million | $165.64 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2019 | 98.7% | $159.83 Million | $161.99 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 98.9% | $152.14 Million | $153.88 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 98.7% | $155.19 Million | $157.27 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2016 | 97.7% | $157.04 Million | $160.65 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 97.6% | $160.64 Million | $164.55 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 97.5% | $162.53 Million | $166.65 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2008 | 94.0% | $132.19 Million | $140.63 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2007 | 98.1% | $174.49 Million | $177.83 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2006 | 98.8% | $190.29 Million | $192.68 Million | — |