Eaton Vance California MIT Net Asset Quality Index
Eaton Vance California MIT net asset quality index. Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 66.1% as of November 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $119.33 Million minus total liabilities of $40.48 Million yields net assets of $78.85 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Eaton Vance California MIT net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Eaton Vance California MIT (2006–2025)
Net asset quality index of Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025. This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MIT's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of November 2025, the index stands at 66.1%, representing net assets of $78.85 Million against total assets of $119.33 Million USD. Check how strategically is Eaton Vance California MIT's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Eaton Vance California MIT Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2006–2025)
Eaton Vance California MIT net asset quality index by year from 2006 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Eaton Vance California MIT.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 66.1% | $78.85 Million | $119.33 Million | $40.48 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2024 | 75.6% | $83.07 Million | $109.95 Million | $26.88 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2023 | 71.4% | $81.42 Million | $114.11 Million | $32.69 Million | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2022 | 64.9% | $81.95 Million | $126.19 Million | $44.24 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2021 | 63.2% | $104.47 Million | $165.31 Million | $60.85 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 63.3% | $104.79 Million | $165.64 Million | $60.85 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2019 | 63.1% | $102.19 Million | $161.99 Million | $59.81 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2018 | 60.9% | $93.70 Million | $153.88 Million | $60.18 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2017 | 65.4% | $102.93 Million | $157.27 Million | $54.34 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2016 | 63.3% | $101.63 Million | $160.65 Million | $59.02 Million | ▼ -28.9 pp |
| 2015 | 92.2% | $151.71 Million | $164.55 Million | $12.85 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2014 | 91.3% | $152.10 Million | $166.65 Million | $14.55 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 90.5% | $141.31 Million | $156.19 Million | $14.88 Million | ▲ +28.8 pp |
| 2012 | 61.7% | $106.37 Million | $172.36 Million | $65.99 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2011 | 57.2% | $89.86 Million | $157.22 Million | $67.36 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2010 | 55.2% | $89.40 Million | $161.91 Million | $72.51 Million | ▼ -30.9 pp |
| 2008 | 86.1% | $121.04 Million | $140.63 Million | $19.59 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2007 | 94.2% | $167.57 Million | $177.83 Million | $10.26 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 91.9% | $176.99 Million | $192.68 Million | $15.69 Million | — |