Eaton Vance California MIT Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Eaton Vance California MIT tangible net worth ratio. Eaton Vance California MIT (CEV) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of November 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($78.85 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check how strategically is Eaton Vance California MIT's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Eaton Vance California MIT (2006–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025. This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MIT's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 19 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $78.85 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. See Eaton Vance California MIT working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Eaton Vance California MIT Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2006–2025)
Eaton Vance California MIT tangible net worth ratio by year from 2006 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eaton Vance California MIT from 2006 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Eaton Vance California MIT worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $78.85 Million | $0.00 | $119.33 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $83.07 Million | $0.00 | $109.95 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $81.42 Million | $0.00 | $114.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $81.95 Million | $0.00 | $126.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $104.47 Million | $0.00 | $165.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $104.79 Million | $0.00 | $165.64 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $102.19 Million | $0.00 | $161.99 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $93.70 Million | $0.00 | $153.88 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $102.93 Million | $0.00 | $157.27 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $101.63 Million | $0.00 | $160.65 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $151.71 Million | $0.00 | $164.55 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $152.10 Million | $0.00 | $166.65 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $141.31 Million | $0.00 | $156.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $106.37 Million | $0.00 | $172.36 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $89.86 Million | $0.00 | $157.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $89.40 Million | $0.00 | $161.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $121.04 Million | $0.00 | $140.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $167.57 Million | $0.00 | $177.83 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $176.99 Million | $0.00 | $192.68 Million | — |