The Hanover Insurance Group Inc (THG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
The Hanover Insurance Group Inc (THG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $118.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.96 Billion) in one year. Explore THG long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
The Hanover Insurance Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for The Hanover Insurance Group Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore The Hanover Insurance Group Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for The Hanover Insurance Group Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for The Hanover Insurance Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of The Hanover Insurance Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $1.18 Billion | $13.37 Billion | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $806.40 Million | $12.43 Billion | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $361.70 Million | $12.15 Billion | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $722.30 Million | $11.66 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $823.70 Million | $11.11 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $707.60 Million | $10.24 Billion | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $602.90 Million | $9.57 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $551.30 Million | $9.45 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $704.60 Million | $12.47 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $743.40 Million | $11.36 Billion | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $444.70 Million | $10.95 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $564.70 Million | $10.92 Billion | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $383.90 Million | $10.78 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $408.20 Million | $10.89 Billion | ▲ +71.0% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $221.70 Million | $10.11 Billion | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $83.60 Million | $6.11 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $91.60 Million | $5.68 Billion | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $209.50 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▲ +192.6% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $73.30 Million | $7.52 Billion | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $41.80 Million | $7.86 Billion | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $153.10 Million | $8.68 Billion | ▲ +164.7% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $142.40 Million | $21.38 Billion | ▲ +189.0% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-174.30 Million | $23.29 Billion | ▼ -514.4% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $43.80 Million | $24.25 Billion | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $597.60 Million | $27.64 Billion | ▲ +292.6% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $159.00 Million | $28.88 Billion | ▲ +923.1% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $15.20 Million | $28.25 Billion | ▼ -64.7% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $37.90 Million | $24.89 Billion | ▲ +117.3% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-173.20 Million | $19.71 Billion | ▼ -192.7% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $156.00 Million | $16.46 Billion | ▲ +13.6% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $128.70 Million | $15.43 Billion | — |