Ho Tung Chemical Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ho Tung Chemical Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ho Tung Chemical Corp (1714) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$-205.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$6.89 Billion) in one year. Check Ho Tung Chemical Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ho Tung Chemical Corp (2002–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ho Tung Chemical Corp from 2002 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ho Tung Chemical Corp across 22 annual periods. Check 1714 cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ho Tung Chemical Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2024)
Ho Tung Chemical Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ho Tung Chemical Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Ho Tung Chemical Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TWD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.21x | NT$1.39 Billion | NT$6.64 Billion | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | NT$1.59 Billion | NT$6.35 Billion | ▲ +571.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | NT$262.51 Million | NT$7.02 Billion | ▼ -88.9% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | NT$2.49 Billion | NT$7.38 Billion | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2020 | 0.78x | NT$6.17 Billion | NT$7.94 Billion | ▲ +266.9% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | NT$2.11 Billion | NT$9.96 Billion | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | NT$1.13 Billion | NT$10.91 Billion | ▲ +189.2% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | NT$439.79 Million | NT$12.26 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | NT$948.77 Million | NT$14.41 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | NT$1.23 Billion | NT$16.26 Billion | ▲ +689.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | NT$308.29 Million | NT$32.22 Billion | ▲ +498.0% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | NT$39.27 Million | NT$24.55 Billion | ▲ +101.7% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | NT$-2.02 Billion | NT$21.42 Billion | ▼ -202.4% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | NT$1.40 Billion | NT$15.24 Billion | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | NT$1.11 Billion | NT$14.94 Billion | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | NT$4.05 Billion | NT$12.15 Billion | ▲ +823.5% |
| 2008 | -0.05x | NT$-644.21 Million | NT$13.99 Billion | ▼ -109.9% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | NT$-368.83 Million | NT$16.81 Billion | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | NT$-466.12 Million | NT$14.79 Billion | ▼ -542.0% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | NT$99.10 Million | NT$13.90 Billion | ▲ +115.0% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | NT$-501.63 Million | NT$10.57 Billion | ▼ -126.8% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | NT$1.61 Billion | NT$9.12 Billion | — |