Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd (9910) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$1.42 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$26.48 Billion) in one year. Check 9910 cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd across 26 annual periods. Check Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Feng Tay Enterprises Co Ltd generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TWD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | NT$8.72 Billion | NT$24.87 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2024 | 0.32x | NT$8.22 Billion | NT$25.56 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | NT$7.30 Billion | NT$25.59 Billion | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | NT$16.85 Billion | NT$24.44 Billion | ▲ +962.9% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | NT$1.76 Billion | NT$27.06 Billion | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | NT$8.59 Billion | NT$24.43 Billion | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2019 | 0.42x | NT$9.39 Billion | NT$22.53 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | NT$8.50 Billion | NT$16.20 Billion | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | NT$5.20 Billion | NT$15.61 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | NT$6.15 Billion | NT$15.43 Billion | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2015 | 0.50x | NT$6.86 Billion | NT$13.82 Billion | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | NT$4.65 Billion | NT$12.97 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | NT$3.89 Billion | NT$10.23 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2012 | 0.40x | NT$3.93 Billion | NT$9.71 Billion | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | NT$2.67 Billion | NT$10.86 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | NT$2.32 Billion | NT$9.45 Billion | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2009 | 0.42x | NT$3.45 Billion | NT$8.14 Billion | ▲ +71.6% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | NT$2.03 Billion | NT$8.23 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | NT$2.79 Billion | NT$7.39 Billion | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2006 | 0.27x | NT$1.90 Billion | NT$7.15 Billion | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2005 | 0.60x | NT$2.98 Billion | NT$5.00 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2004 | 0.74x | NT$3.13 Billion | NT$4.24 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2003 | 0.65x | NT$2.34 Billion | NT$3.63 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.65x | NT$2.21 Billion | NT$3.43 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2001 | 0.74x | NT$2.42 Billion | NT$3.25 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2000 | 0.56x | NT$2.32 Billion | NT$4.12 Billion | — |