Kinik Co (1560) — Net Asset Quality Index
Kinik Co (1560) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 61.4% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of NT$13.96 Billion minus total liabilities of NT$5.38 Billion yields net assets of NT$8.58 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Kinik Co defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Kinik Co Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Kinik Co's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 61.4%, representing net assets of NT$8.58 Billion against total assets of NT$13.96 Billion TWD. Explore 1560 cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Kinik Co (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kinik Co from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Kinik Co stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TWD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64.0% | NT$8.49 Billion | NT$13.26 Billion | NT$4.77 Billion | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2024 | 67.2% | NT$7.43 Billion | NT$11.05 Billion | NT$3.62 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2023 | 65.6% | NT$6.47 Billion | NT$9.86 Billion | NT$3.39 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2022 | 63.8% | NT$6.09 Billion | NT$9.54 Billion | NT$3.45 Billion | ▲ +14.1 pp |
| 2021 | 49.7% | NT$5.05 Billion | NT$10.16 Billion | NT$5.11 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2020 | 50.1% | NT$4.74 Billion | NT$9.45 Billion | NT$4.72 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2019 | 58.1% | NT$4.61 Billion | NT$7.93 Billion | NT$3.32 Billion | ▼ -10.5 pp |
| 2018 | 68.6% | NT$4.55 Billion | NT$6.63 Billion | NT$2.08 Billion | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2017 | 76.4% | NT$4.05 Billion | NT$5.31 Billion | NT$1.25 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 75.7% | NT$3.78 Billion | NT$5.00 Billion | NT$1.22 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2015 | 74.1% | NT$3.80 Billion | NT$5.13 Billion | NT$1.33 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2014 | 72.6% | NT$3.83 Billion | NT$5.28 Billion | NT$1.45 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2013 | 69.0% | NT$3.66 Billion | NT$5.30 Billion | NT$1.64 Billion | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2012 | 79.1% | NT$3.65 Billion | NT$4.62 Billion | NT$967.15 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2011 | 76.5% | NT$3.63 Billion | NT$4.74 Billion | NT$1.11 Billion | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2010 | 69.4% | NT$3.40 Billion | NT$4.91 Billion | NT$1.50 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 68.4% | NT$3.26 Billion | NT$4.77 Billion | NT$1.51 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2008 | 66.2% | NT$3.49 Billion | NT$5.27 Billion | NT$1.78 Billion | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2007 | 61.7% | NT$3.63 Billion | NT$5.89 Billion | NT$2.26 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 59.3% | NT$3.53 Billion | NT$5.96 Billion | NT$2.42 Billion | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2005 | 53.5% | NT$3.08 Billion | NT$5.76 Billion | NT$2.68 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2004 | 50.3% | NT$1.69 Billion | NT$3.35 Billion | NT$1.67 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2003 | 45.6% | NT$1.42 Billion | NT$3.11 Billion | NT$1.69 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2002 | 39.7% | NT$1.20 Billion | NT$3.01 Billion | NT$1.81 Billion | — |