Kinik Co (1560) — Net Asset Quality Index
Kinik Co (1560) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 62.7% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of NT$12.56 Billion minus total liabilities of NT$4.69 Billion yields net assets of NT$7.87 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Kinik Co liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Kinik Co Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2024)
This chart shows how Kinik Co's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2002 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 62.7%, representing net assets of NT$7.87 Billion against total assets of NT$12.56 Billion TWD. See Kinik Co working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Kinik Co (2002–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kinik Co from 2002 to 2024, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see 1560 stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TWD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67.2% | NT$7.43 Billion | NT$11.05 Billion | NT$3.62 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2023 | 65.6% | NT$6.47 Billion | NT$9.86 Billion | NT$3.39 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2022 | 63.8% | NT$6.09 Billion | NT$9.54 Billion | NT$3.45 Billion | ▲ +14.1 pp |
| 2021 | 49.7% | NT$5.05 Billion | NT$10.16 Billion | NT$5.11 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2020 | 50.1% | NT$4.74 Billion | NT$9.45 Billion | NT$4.72 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2019 | 58.1% | NT$4.61 Billion | NT$7.93 Billion | NT$3.32 Billion | ▼ -10.5 pp |
| 2018 | 68.6% | NT$4.55 Billion | NT$6.63 Billion | NT$2.08 Billion | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2017 | 76.4% | NT$4.05 Billion | NT$5.31 Billion | NT$1.25 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 75.7% | NT$3.78 Billion | NT$5.00 Billion | NT$1.22 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2015 | 74.1% | NT$3.80 Billion | NT$5.13 Billion | NT$1.33 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2014 | 72.6% | NT$3.83 Billion | NT$5.28 Billion | NT$1.45 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2013 | 69.0% | NT$3.66 Billion | NT$5.30 Billion | NT$1.64 Billion | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2012 | 79.1% | NT$3.65 Billion | NT$4.62 Billion | NT$967.15 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2011 | 76.5% | NT$3.63 Billion | NT$4.74 Billion | NT$1.11 Billion | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2010 | 69.4% | NT$3.40 Billion | NT$4.91 Billion | NT$1.50 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 68.4% | NT$3.26 Billion | NT$4.77 Billion | NT$1.51 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2008 | 66.2% | NT$3.49 Billion | NT$5.27 Billion | NT$1.78 Billion | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2007 | 61.7% | NT$3.63 Billion | NT$5.89 Billion | NT$2.26 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 59.3% | NT$3.53 Billion | NT$5.96 Billion | NT$2.42 Billion | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2005 | 53.5% | NT$3.08 Billion | NT$5.76 Billion | NT$2.68 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2004 | 50.3% | NT$1.69 Billion | NT$3.35 Billion | NT$1.67 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2003 | 45.6% | NT$1.42 Billion | NT$3.11 Billion | NT$1.69 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2002 | 39.7% | NT$1.20 Billion | NT$3.01 Billion | NT$1.81 Billion | — |