Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -21402.0% as of March 2016. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Rs41.18 Billion) from net assets (Rs191.50 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See working capital to net assets of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2016)
This chart shows how Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 1999 to 2016. As of March 2016, the ratio stands at -21402.0%, reflecting net assets of Rs191.50 Million with intangible assets of Rs41.18 Billion INR. See Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (1999–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited from 1999 to 2016, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (INR) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | -21402.0% | Rs191.50 Million | Rs41.18 Billion | Rs261.51 Billion | ▼ -21285.6 pp |
| 2015 | -116.5% | Rs20.59 Billion | Rs44.56 Billion | Rs268.90 Billion | ▼ -121.4 pp |
| 2014 | 4.9% | Rs50.43 Billion | Rs47.97 Billion | Rs275.15 Billion | ▲ +246.1 pp |
| 2011 | -241.2% | Rs27.77 Billion | Rs94.75 Billion | Rs245.05 Billion | ▼ -174.7 pp |
| 2010 | -66.5% | Rs60.67 Billion | Rs100.98 Billion | Rs313.71 Billion | ▼ -166.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.7% | Rs88.79 Billion | Rs309.00 Million | Rs199.31 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 99.6% | Rs88.36 Billion | Rs320.00 Million | Rs193.44 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | Rs89.08 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs179.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | Rs80.61 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs170.44 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | Rs83.41 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs176.90 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | Rs80.78 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs175.92 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | Rs76.45 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs151.75 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | Rs81.03 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs166.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | Rs137.61 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs220.84 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | Rs116.47 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs201.21 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | Rs48.87 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs137.16 Billion | — |