Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -21402.0% as of March 2016. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Rs41.18 Billion) from net assets (Rs191.50 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2016)
This chart shows how Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 1999 to 2016. As of March 2016, the ratio stands at -21402.0%, reflecting net assets of Rs191.50 Million with intangible assets of Rs41.18 Billion INR. Also explore Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (1999–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited from 1999 to 2016, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. See financial agility of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (INR) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | -21402.0% | Rs191.50 Million | Rs41.18 Billion | Rs261.51 Billion | ▼ -21285.6 pp |
| 2015 | -116.5% | Rs20.59 Billion | Rs44.56 Billion | Rs268.90 Billion | ▼ -121.4 pp |
| 2014 | 4.9% | Rs50.43 Billion | Rs47.97 Billion | Rs275.15 Billion | ▲ +246.1 pp |
| 2011 | -241.2% | Rs27.77 Billion | Rs94.75 Billion | Rs245.05 Billion | ▼ -174.7 pp |
| 2010 | -66.5% | Rs60.67 Billion | Rs100.98 Billion | Rs313.71 Billion | ▼ -166.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.7% | Rs88.79 Billion | Rs309.00 Million | Rs199.31 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 99.6% | Rs88.36 Billion | Rs320.00 Million | Rs193.44 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | Rs89.08 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs179.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | Rs80.61 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs170.44 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | Rs83.41 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs176.90 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | Rs80.78 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs175.92 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | Rs76.45 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs151.75 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | Rs81.03 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs166.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | Rs137.61 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs220.84 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | Rs116.47 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs201.21 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | Rs48.87 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs137.16 Billion | — |