Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -21402.0% as of March 2016. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Rs41.18 Billion) from net assets (Rs191.50 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore MTNL shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2016)
This chart shows how Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 1999 to 2016. As of March 2016, the ratio stands at -21402.0%, reflecting net assets of Rs191.50 Million with intangible assets of Rs41.18 Billion INR. Check asset allocation strategy of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (1999–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited from 1999 to 2016, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see MTNL market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (INR) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | -21402.0% | Rs191.50 Million | Rs41.18 Billion | Rs261.51 Billion | ▼ -21285.6 pp |
| 2015 | -116.5% | Rs20.59 Billion | Rs44.56 Billion | Rs268.90 Billion | ▼ -121.4 pp |
| 2014 | 4.9% | Rs50.43 Billion | Rs47.97 Billion | Rs275.15 Billion | ▲ +246.1 pp |
| 2011 | -241.2% | Rs27.77 Billion | Rs94.75 Billion | Rs245.05 Billion | ▼ -174.7 pp |
| 2010 | -66.5% | Rs60.67 Billion | Rs100.98 Billion | Rs313.71 Billion | ▼ -166.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.7% | Rs88.79 Billion | Rs309.00 Million | Rs199.31 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 99.6% | Rs88.36 Billion | Rs320.00 Million | Rs193.44 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | Rs89.08 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs179.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | Rs80.61 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs170.44 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | Rs83.41 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs176.90 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | Rs80.78 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs175.92 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | Rs76.45 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs151.75 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | Rs81.03 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs166.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | Rs137.61 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs220.84 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | Rs116.47 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs201.21 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | Rs48.87 Billion | Rs0.00 | Rs137.16 Billion | — |