Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $36.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.80 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Peapack-Gladstone Financial to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Peapack-Gladstone Financial across 28 annual periods. Also explore PGC shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Peapack-Gladstone Financial (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PGC market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $71.10 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $70.08 Million | $5.89 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $118.90 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $75.46 Million | $5.53 Billion | ▲ +99.3% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $36.72 Million | $5.36 Billion | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $86.30 Million | $4.68 Billion | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $64.25 Million | $4.15 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $55.94 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $42.93 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $30.31 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $27.26 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $32.70 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $17.85 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $22.46 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $21.95 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +182.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $7.80 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $13.07 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $15.85 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $22.30 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $14.50 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $14.69 Million | $972.73 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $13.98 Million | $883.07 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $17.61 Million | $782.65 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $10.11 Million | $641.69 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $9.78 Million | $513.26 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $8.00 Million | $449.90 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $7.78 Million | $436.47 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $5.18 Million | $330.03 Million | — |