Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd (3026) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$338.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$5.79 Billion) in one year. Check 3026 cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd across 23 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Holy Stone Enterprise Co Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TWD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | NT$1.35 Billion | NT$5.79 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | NT$1.61 Billion | NT$5.45 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | NT$1.60 Billion | NT$5.00 Billion | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | NT$1.24 Billion | NT$6.04 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | NT$1.58 Billion | NT$6.19 Billion | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | NT$901.22 Million | NT$5.09 Billion | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2019 | 0.34x | NT$1.53 Billion | NT$4.51 Billion | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2018 | 0.70x | NT$3.09 Billion | NT$4.39 Billion | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2017 | 0.44x | NT$1.58 Billion | NT$3.60 Billion | ▲ +154.5% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | NT$602.84 Million | NT$3.49 Billion | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2015 | 0.56x | NT$1.76 Billion | NT$3.17 Billion | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | NT$1.55 Billion | NT$3.98 Billion | ▲ +1135.1% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | NT$156.64 Million | NT$4.96 Billion | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | NT$1.23 Billion | NT$4.29 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | NT$1.37 Billion | NT$4.81 Billion | ▲ +570.6% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | NT$202.00 Million | NT$4.74 Billion | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | NT$1.32 Billion | NT$4.24 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2008 | 0.37x | NT$1.45 Billion | NT$3.86 Billion | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.48x | NT$1.60 Billion | NT$3.36 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | NT$1.67 Billion | NT$3.52 Billion | ▲ +217.2% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | NT$562.66 Million | NT$3.76 Billion | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | NT$666.84 Million | NT$4.12 Billion | ▲ +324.0% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | NT$80.48 Million | NT$2.11 Billion | — |