InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Tangible Net Worth Ratio
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC tangible net worth ratio. InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -211.3% as of December 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($993.00 Million) from net assets ($319.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore InterContinental Hotels Group PLC annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (2000–2015)
Tangible net worth ratio of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC from 2000 to 2015. This chart shows how InterContinental Hotels Group PLC's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 14 annual periods from 2000 to 2015. As of December 2015, the ratio stands at -211.3%, reflecting net assets of $319.00 Million with intangible assets of $993.00 Million USD. Check asset allocation strategy of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2015)
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2015. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC from 2000 to 2015, covering 14 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see InterContinental Hotels Group PLC stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | -211.3% | $216.43 Million | $673.72 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -199.6 pp |
| 2012 | -11.7% | $195.02 Million | $217.78 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -56.2 pp |
| 2011 | 44.5% | $357.12 Million | $198.19 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +35.9 pp |
| 2010 | 8.6% | $185.87 Million | $169.90 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▲ +84.2 pp |
| 2009 | -75.6% | $96.60 Million | $169.68 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +30024.4 pp |
| 2008 | -30100.0% | $695.53K | $210.05 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -29858.2 pp |
| 2007 | -241.8% | $24.75 Million | $84.59 Million | $913.33 Million | ▼ -319.4 pp |
| 2006 | 77.6% | $357.01 Million | $80.15 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2005 | 89.1% | $640.66 Million | $69.64 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2004 | 97.2% | $1.94 Billion | $54.00 Million | $4.79 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2003 | 94.2% | $4.85 Billion | $282.14 Million | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2002 | 98.0% | $8.65 Billion | $173.00 Million | $14.25 Billion | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2001 | 94.6% | $4.44 Billion | $240.05 Million | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2000 | 93.8% | $4.24 Billion | $262.69 Million | $8.87 Billion | — |