Braskem SA Class A (BAK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Braskem SA Class A (BAK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -31.7% as of March 2024. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($3.12 Billion) from net assets ($2.37 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See BAK total equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Braskem SA Class A Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2023)
This chart shows how Braskem SA Class A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1998 to 2023. As of March 2024, the ratio stands at -31.7%, reflecting net assets of $2.37 Billion with intangible assets of $3.12 Billion USD. Also explore net asset momentum of Braskem SA Class A to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Braskem SA Class A (1998–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Braskem SA Class A from 1998 to 2023, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Braskem SA Class A worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 71.5% | $3.28 Billion | $935.00 Million | $91.74 Billion | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2022 | 50.5% | $6.11 Billion | $3.02 Billion | $88.05 Billion | ▼ -36.3 pp |
| 2021 | 86.8% | $6.20 Billion | $818.42 Million | $92.56 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 88.2% | $5.69 Billion | $668.62 Million | $53.34 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 88.5% | $5.91 Billion | $682.11 Million | $59.19 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 87.8% | $5.47 Billion | $668.62 Million | $52.73 Billion | ▲ +31.4 pp |
| 2016 | 56.4% | $1.72 Billion | $750.21 Million | $51.82 Billion | ▲ +44.0 pp |
| 2015 | 12.4% | $945.49 Million | $828.69 Million | $60.63 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2014 | 86.8% | $5.89 Billion | $776.81 Million | $49.42 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2013 | 88.9% | $7.68 Billion | $853.71 Million | $46.82 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 89.8% | $8.65 Billion | $882.05 Million | $41.17 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | $9.95 Billion | $952.94 Million | $37.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 90.2% | $10.41 Billion | $1.02 Billion | $34.48 Billion | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2009 | 94.7% | $4.74 Billion | $253.14 Million | $22.11 Billion | ▲ +59.3 pp |
| 2008 | 35.4% | $3.68 Billion | $2.38 Billion | $22.70 Billion | ▼ -61.9 pp |
| 2007 | 97.3% | $6.35 Billion | $172.39 Million | $20.89 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | $4.32 Billion | $129.19 Million | $16.26 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $4.65 Billion | $0.00 | $15.58 Billion | ▲ +54.9 pp |
| 2004 | 45.1% | $4.39 Billion | $2.41 Billion | $14.90 Billion | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2003 | 28.3% | $2.66 Billion | $1.90 Billion | $13.83 Billion | ▼ -27.2 pp |
| 2002 | 55.5% | $2.54 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 55.5% | $2.54 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▼ -44.5 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $2.31 Billion | $0.00 | $3.73 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $2.12 Billion | $0.00 | $3.59 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.91 Billion | $0.00 | $3.12 Billion | — |