Braskem SA Class A (BAK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Braskem SA Class A (BAK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -31.7% as of March 2024. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($3.12 Billion) from net assets ($2.37 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Braskem SA Class A short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Braskem SA Class A Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2023)
This chart shows how Braskem SA Class A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1998 to 2023. As of March 2024, the ratio stands at -31.7%, reflecting net assets of $2.37 Billion with intangible assets of $3.12 Billion USD. See Braskem SA Class A (BAK) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Braskem SA Class A (1998–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Braskem SA Class A from 1998 to 2023, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market value of Braskem SA Class A.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 71.5% | $3.28 Billion | $935.00 Million | $91.74 Billion | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2022 | 50.5% | $6.11 Billion | $3.02 Billion | $88.05 Billion | ▼ -36.3 pp |
| 2021 | 86.8% | $6.20 Billion | $818.42 Million | $92.56 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 88.2% | $5.69 Billion | $668.62 Million | $53.34 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 88.5% | $5.91 Billion | $682.11 Million | $59.19 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 87.8% | $5.47 Billion | $668.62 Million | $52.73 Billion | ▲ +31.4 pp |
| 2016 | 56.4% | $1.72 Billion | $750.21 Million | $51.82 Billion | ▲ +44.0 pp |
| 2015 | 12.4% | $945.49 Million | $828.69 Million | $60.63 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2014 | 86.8% | $5.89 Billion | $776.81 Million | $49.42 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2013 | 88.9% | $7.68 Billion | $853.71 Million | $46.82 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 89.8% | $8.65 Billion | $882.05 Million | $41.17 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | $9.95 Billion | $952.94 Million | $37.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 90.2% | $10.41 Billion | $1.02 Billion | $34.48 Billion | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2009 | 94.7% | $4.74 Billion | $253.14 Million | $22.11 Billion | ▲ +59.3 pp |
| 2008 | 35.4% | $3.68 Billion | $2.38 Billion | $22.70 Billion | ▼ -61.9 pp |
| 2007 | 97.3% | $6.35 Billion | $172.39 Million | $20.89 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | $4.32 Billion | $129.19 Million | $16.26 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $4.65 Billion | $0.00 | $15.58 Billion | ▲ +54.9 pp |
| 2004 | 45.1% | $4.39 Billion | $2.41 Billion | $14.90 Billion | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2003 | 28.3% | $2.66 Billion | $1.90 Billion | $13.83 Billion | ▼ -27.2 pp |
| 2002 | 55.5% | $2.54 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 55.5% | $2.54 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▼ -44.5 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $2.31 Billion | $0.00 | $3.73 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $2.12 Billion | $0.00 | $3.59 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.91 Billion | $0.00 | $3.12 Billion | — |