Braskem SA Class A Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Braskem SA Class A tangible net worth ratio. Braskem SA Class A (BAK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -31.7% as of March 2024. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($3.12 Billion) from net assets ($2.37 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Braskem SA Class A (BAK) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Braskem SA Class A (1998–2023)
Tangible net worth ratio of Braskem SA Class A from 1998 to 2023. This chart shows how Braskem SA Class A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1998 to 2023. As of March 2024, the ratio stands at -31.7%, reflecting net assets of $2.37 Billion with intangible assets of $3.12 Billion USD. See Braskem SA Class A (BAK) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Braskem SA Class A Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2023)
Braskem SA Class A tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2023. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Braskem SA Class A from 1998 to 2023, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Braskem SA Class A market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 71.5% | $3.28 Billion | $935.00 Million | $91.74 Billion | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2022 | 50.5% | $6.11 Billion | $3.02 Billion | $88.05 Billion | ▼ -36.3 pp |
| 2021 | 86.8% | $6.20 Billion | $818.42 Million | $92.56 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 88.2% | $5.69 Billion | $668.62 Million | $53.34 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 88.5% | $5.91 Billion | $682.11 Million | $59.19 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 87.8% | $5.47 Billion | $668.62 Million | $52.73 Billion | ▲ +31.4 pp |
| 2016 | 56.4% | $1.72 Billion | $750.21 Million | $51.82 Billion | ▲ +44.0 pp |
| 2015 | 12.4% | $945.49 Million | $828.69 Million | $60.63 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2014 | 86.8% | $5.89 Billion | $776.81 Million | $49.42 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2013 | 88.9% | $7.68 Billion | $853.71 Million | $46.82 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 89.8% | $8.65 Billion | $882.05 Million | $41.17 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | $9.95 Billion | $952.94 Million | $37.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 90.2% | $10.41 Billion | $1.02 Billion | $34.48 Billion | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2009 | 94.7% | $4.74 Billion | $253.14 Million | $22.11 Billion | ▲ +59.3 pp |
| 2008 | 35.4% | $3.68 Billion | $2.38 Billion | $22.70 Billion | ▼ -61.9 pp |
| 2007 | 97.3% | $6.35 Billion | $172.39 Million | $20.89 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | $4.32 Billion | $129.19 Million | $16.26 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $4.65 Billion | $0.00 | $15.58 Billion | ▲ +54.9 pp |
| 2004 | 45.1% | $4.39 Billion | $2.41 Billion | $14.90 Billion | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2003 | 28.3% | $2.66 Billion | $1.90 Billion | $13.83 Billion | ▼ -27.2 pp |
| 2002 | 55.5% | $2.54 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 55.5% | $2.54 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▼ -44.5 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $2.31 Billion | $0.00 | $3.73 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $2.12 Billion | $0.00 | $3.59 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.91 Billion | $0.00 | $3.12 Billion | — |