GS Engineering & Construction Asset Resilience Ratio
GS Engineering & Construction asset resilience ratio. GS Engineering & Construction (006360) has an Asset Resilience Ratio of 3.13% as of September 2025. The Asset Resilience Ratio measures the percentage of a company's total assets that are held in liquid form (cash and short-term investments). This metric indicates how well-positioned the company is to handle unexpected financial challenges, economic downturns, or strategic opportunities without requiring external financing. See defensive interval ratio of GS Engineering & Construction to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Liquid Assets
Total Assets
Resilience Assessment
Asset Resilience Ratio of GS Engineering & Construction (2000–2024)
Asset resilience ratio of GS Engineering & Construction from 2000 to 2024. This chart shows how GS Engineering & Construction's Asset Resilience Ratio has changed over time. Read total liabilities of GS Engineering & Construction for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Liquid Assets Composition Over Time
This chart breaks down GS Engineering & Construction's liquid assets into cash & equivalents and short-term investments, showing how the composition has evolved over time. For the complete balance sheet picture, see 006360 asset base.
Current Liquid Assets Breakdown
| Component | Amount | % of Total Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | ₩0.00 | 0% |
| Short-term Investments | ₩560.82 Billion | 3.13% |
| Total Liquid Assets | ₩560.82 Billion | 3.13% |
Asset Resilience Insights
- Limited Liquidity: GS Engineering & Construction maintains only 3.13% of assets in liquid form.
- This low level may indicate efficient asset utilization but could pose risks during economic downturns.
- The company has significant short-term investments, indicating active treasury management.
GS Engineering & Construction Industry Peers by Asset Resilience Ratio
Compare GS Engineering & Construction's asset resilience ratio with other companies in the same industry.
| Company | Industry | Asset Resilience Ratio |
|---|---|---|
|
Sichuan Road & Bridge Group Co Ltd
SHG:600039 |
Engineering & Construction | 0.01% |
|
China Communications Construction Co Ltd
SHG:601800 |
Engineering & Construction | 0.05% |
|
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd
SHG:600820 |
Engineering & Construction | 0.65% |
|
Hyundai Development Co
KO:294870 |
Engineering & Construction | 1.36% |
|
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Ltd
AU:SXE |
Engineering & Construction | 15.57% |
|
Shanghai Urban Architecture Design Co. Ltd.
SHE:300983 |
Engineering & Construction | 9.70% |
|
Shanghai Tongji Science&Technology Industrial Co Ltd
SHG:600846 |
Engineering & Construction | 0.05% |
|
Tengda Construction Group Co Ltd
SHG:600512 |
Engineering & Construction | 4.84% |
GS Engineering & Construction Asset Resilience Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
GS Engineering & Construction asset resilience ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. The table below shows the annual Asset Resilience Ratio data for GS Engineering & Construction.
| Year | Asset Resilience Ratio (%) | Liquid Assets | Total Assets | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-31 | 2.68% | ₩477.13 Billion ≈ $323.34 Million |
₩17.80 Trillion ≈ $12.07 Billion |
-0.45pp |
| 2023-12-31 | 3.13% | ₩553.76 Billion ≈ $375.27 Million |
₩17.71 Trillion ≈ $12.00 Billion |
+0.21pp |
| 2022-12-31 | 2.91% | ₩493.78 Billion ≈ $334.63 Million |
₩16.95 Trillion ≈ $11.48 Billion |
+1.00pp |
| 2021-12-31 | 1.91% | ₩290.40 Billion ≈ $196.80 Million |
₩15.18 Trillion ≈ $10.29 Billion |
+0.04pp |
| 2020-12-31 | 1.87% | ₩257.87 Billion ≈ $174.75 Million |
₩13.77 Trillion ≈ $9.33 Billion |
-0.73pp |
| 2019-12-31 | 2.61% | ₩343.28 Billion ≈ $232.63 Million |
₩13.17 Trillion ≈ $8.93 Billion |
-0.61pp |
| 2018-12-31 | 3.22% | ₩387.53 Billion ≈ $262.62 Million |
₩12.03 Trillion ≈ $8.15 Billion |
+0.52pp |
| 2017-12-31 | 2.70% | ₩370.15 Billion ≈ $250.84 Million |
₩13.70 Trillion ≈ $9.28 Billion |
-0.15pp |
| 2016-12-31 | 2.85% | ₩381.68 Billion ≈ $258.66 Million |
₩13.38 Trillion ≈ $9.07 Billion |
+1.72pp |
| 2015-12-31 | 1.13% | ₩146.91 Billion ≈ $99.56 Million |
₩13.01 Trillion ≈ $8.81 Billion |
-2.16pp |
| 2014-12-31 | 3.29% | ₩430.38 Billion ≈ $291.67 Million |
₩13.09 Trillion ≈ $8.87 Billion |
-0.26pp |
| 2013-12-31 | 3.55% | ₩440.92 Billion ≈ $298.80 Million |
₩12.43 Trillion ≈ $8.42 Billion |
+1.21pp |
| 2012-12-31 | 2.34% | ₩268.11 Billion ≈ $181.70 Million |
₩11.47 Trillion ≈ $7.77 Billion |
-0.55pp |
| 2011-12-31 | 2.89% | ₩320.41 Billion ≈ $217.14 Million |
₩11.10 Trillion ≈ $7.52 Billion |
-4.31pp |
| 2010-12-31 | 7.20% | ₩752.13 Billion ≈ $509.71 Million |
₩10.45 Trillion ≈ $7.08 Billion |
+2.78pp |
| 2009-12-31 | 4.42% | ₩437.61 Billion ≈ $296.56 Million |
₩9.90 Trillion ≈ $6.71 Billion |
+1.34pp |
| 2008-12-31 | 3.08% | ₩277.22 Billion ≈ $187.87 Million |
₩9.00 Trillion ≈ $6.10 Billion |
+1.72pp |
| 2007-12-31 | 1.36% | ₩85.98 Billion ≈ $58.27 Million |
₩6.34 Trillion ≈ $4.30 Billion |
+0.36pp |
| 2006-12-31 | 1.00% | ₩53.33 Billion ≈ $36.14 Million |
₩5.35 Trillion ≈ $3.63 Billion |
-1.22pp |
| 2005-12-31 | 2.22% | ₩100.47 Billion ≈ $68.09 Million |
₩4.53 Trillion ≈ $3.07 Billion |
+0.63pp |
| 2004-12-31 | 1.59% | ₩61.08 Billion ≈ $41.39 Million |
₩3.85 Trillion ≈ $2.61 Billion |
-0.42pp |
| 2003-12-31 | 2.00% | ₩65.28 Billion ≈ $44.24 Million |
₩3.26 Trillion ≈ $2.21 Billion |
-0.25pp |
| 2002-12-31 | 2.26% | ₩73.36 Billion ≈ $49.71 Million |
₩3.25 Trillion ≈ $2.20 Billion |
+0.49pp |
| 2001-12-31 | 1.76% | ₩59.26 Billion ≈ $40.16 Million |
₩3.36 Trillion ≈ $2.28 Billion |
-0.81pp |
| 2000-12-31 | 2.58% | ₩79.07 Billion ≈ $53.58 Million |
₩3.07 Trillion ≈ $2.08 Billion |
-- |
About GS Engineering & Construction
GS Engineering & Construction Corporation engages in the civil works and construction, sales of new houses, repairs and maintenance, overseas general construction, and technology consultation activities in South Korea and internationally. It operates through Architectural & Housing Construction, New Business, Plant Construction, Infra Works, Green Business, and Others segments. The Architectural … Read more