Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.04x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $7.50 Million exceeds net income of $7.20 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how efficiently does Dine Brands Global Inc generate cash to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Dine Brands Global Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Dine Brands Global Inc across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check DIN total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Dine Brands Global Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Dine Brands Global Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5.20x | $89.00 Million | $17.10 Million | ▲ +212.3% |
| 2024 | 1.67x | $108.16 Million | $64.89 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2023 | 1.35x | $131.14 Million | $97.18 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2022 | 1.10x | $89.34 Million | $81.11 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2021 | 2.00x | $195.84 Million | $97.86 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2019 | 1.49x | $155.18 Million | $104.35 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2018 | 1.75x | $140.35 Million | $80.35 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2016 | 1.17x | $118.11 Million | $101.00 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $135.51 Million | $104.92 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2014 | 3.25x | $118.52 Million | $36.45 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2013 | 1.77x | $127.81 Million | $72.04 Million | ▲ +328.4% |
| 2012 | 0.41x | $52.88 Million | $127.67 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2011 | 1.62x | $121.69 Million | $75.19 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2009 | 5.03x | $157.85 Million | $31.41 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2006 | 1.46x | $64.86 Million | $44.55 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2005 | 1.26x | $55.35 Million | $43.94 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2004 | 2.00x | $66.98 Million | $33.42 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2003 | 1.94x | $71.31 Million | $36.78 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2002 | 1.91x | $78.11 Million | $40.85 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2001 | 1.38x | $55.70 Million | $40.29 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2000 | 1.91x | $67.52 Million | $35.34 Million | ▲ +22.2% |
| 1999 | 1.56x | $50.20 Million | $32.10 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1998 | 2.07x | $53.90 Million | $26.10 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 1997 | 1.99x | $41.60 Million | $20.90 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 1996 | 1.70x | $31.60 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 1995 | 1.93x | $31.30 Million | $16.20 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 1994 | 1.58x | $23.80 Million | $15.10 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1993 | 1.36x | $14.60 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1992 | 2.05x | $18.00 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 1991 | 2.11x | $11.20 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 1990 | 3.45x | $10.70 Million | $3.10 Million | — |