Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 134.0% as of June 2017. Strategic assets (PP&E of $200.81 Million plus long-term investments of $136.28 Million) total $337.09 Million, measured against net assets of $251.48 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check DIN asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Dine Brands Global Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2016)
This chart shows how Dine Brands Global Inc's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2000 to 2016. As of June 2017, the index stands at 134.0%, representing strategic assets of $337.09 Million against net assets of $251.48 Million USD. See Dine Brands Global Inc financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Dine Brands Global Inc (2000–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Dine Brands Global Inc from 2000 to 2016, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Dine Brands Global Inc stock valuation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 137.0% | $346.25 Million | $205.06 Million | $141.20 Million | $252.77 Million | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2015 | 142.3% | $380.27 Million | $219.58 Million | $160.69 Million | $267.22 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2014 | 151.2% | $422.08 Million | $241.23 Million | $180.86 Million | $279.07 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2013 | 149.6% | $471.45 Million | $274.30 Million | $197.15 Million | $315.18 Million | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2012 | 164.1% | $506.64 Million | $294.38 Million | $212.27 Million | $308.81 Million | ▼ -287.3 pp |
| 2011 | 451.4% | $700.68 Million | $474.15 Million | $226.53 Million | $155.22 Million | ▼ -281.0 pp |
| 2010 | 732.5% | $612.17 Million | $612.17 Million | $- | $83.58 Million | ▼ -371.0 pp |
| 2009 | 1103.5% | $771.37 Million | $771.37 Million | $- | $69.90 Million | ▼ -824.4 pp |
| 2008 | 1927.8% | $824.48 Million | $824.48 Million | $- | $42.77 Million | ▲ +1383.5 pp |
| 2007 | 544.3% | $1.14 Billion | $1.14 Billion | $- | $209.37 Million | ▲ +437.2 pp |
| 2006 | 107.1% | $309.74 Million | $309.74 Million | $- | $289.21 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2005 | 108.2% | $317.96 Million | $317.96 Million | $- | $293.85 Million | ▲ +12.0 pp |
| 2004 | 96.2% | $326.85 Million | $326.85 Million | $- | $339.76 Million | ▲ +14.0 pp |
| 2003 | 82.2% | $314.22 Million | $314.22 Million | $- | $382.36 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2002 | 78.5% | $286.23 Million | $286.23 Million | $- | $364.39 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2001 | 76.2% | $238.03 Million | $238.03 Million | $- | $312.43 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2000 | 74.5% | $193.62 Million | $193.62 Million | $- | $260.00 Million | — |