Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -202.6% as of June 2017. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($760.98 Million) from net assets ($251.48 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Dine Brands Global Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1990–2016)
This chart shows how Dine Brands Global Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1990 to 2016. As of June 2017, the ratio stands at -202.6%, reflecting net assets of $251.48 Million with intangible assets of $760.98 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Dine Brands Global Inc worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Dine Brands Global Inc (1990–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Dine Brands Global Inc from 1990 to 2016, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore DIN capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | -202.0% | $252.77 Million | $763.40 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2015 | -189.2% | $267.22 Million | $772.90 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2014 | -180.3% | $279.07 Million | $782.30 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -28.5 pp |
| 2013 | -151.9% | $315.18 Million | $793.80 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▲ +9.2 pp |
| 2012 | -161.0% | $308.81 Million | $806.10 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +268.8 pp |
| 2011 | -429.8% | $155.22 Million | $822.36 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +470.3 pp |
| 2010 | -900.1% | $83.58 Million | $835.88 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +215.2 pp |
| 2009 | -1115.3% | $69.90 Million | $849.55 Million | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +1020.1 pp |
| 2008 | -2135.5% | $42.77 Million | $956.04 Million | $3.36 Billion | ▼ -1752.4 pp |
| 2007 | -383.1% | $209.37 Million | $1.01 Billion | $3.83 Billion | ▼ -479.4 pp |
| 2006 | 96.3% | $289.21 Million | $10.77 Million | $768.87 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 96.3% | $293.85 Million | $10.77 Million | $771.08 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2004 | 96.8% | $339.76 Million | $10.77 Million | $821.68 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2003 | 97.2% | $382.36 Million | $10.77 Million | $843.00 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2002 | 97.0% | $364.39 Million | $10.77 Million | $819.80 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2001 | 96.6% | $312.43 Million | $10.77 Million | $641.43 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2000 | 95.7% | $260.00 Million | $11.20 Million | $562.21 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 1999 | 94.9% | $226.50 Million | $11.60 Million | $520.40 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 1998 | 93.6% | $187.90 Million | $12.10 Million | $443.00 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 1997 | 92.0% | $156.20 Million | $12.50 Million | $382.60 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 1996 | 90.0% | $129.40 Million | $12.90 Million | $328.90 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 1995 | 87.7% | $108.30 Million | $13.30 Million | $252.10 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 1994 | 84.4% | $88.30 Million | $13.80 Million | $202.60 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 1993 | 80.1% | $71.20 Million | $14.20 Million | $180.00 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 1992 | 74.3% | $58.00 Million | $14.90 Million | $149.80 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 1991 | 68.6% | $48.70 Million | $15.30 Million | $112.80 Million | ▲ +74.0 pp |
| 1990 | -5.4% | $14.90 Million | $15.70 Million | $93.70 Million | — |