Dine Brands Global Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dine Brands Global Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.06 Billion) in one year. Check Dine Brands Global Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dine Brands Global Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dine Brands Global Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dine Brands Global Inc across 36 annual periods. Check DIN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Dine Brands Global Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Dine Brands Global Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dine Brands Global Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Dine Brands Global Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $89.00 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $108.16 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $131.14 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $89.34 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $195.84 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $96.50 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $155.18 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $140.35 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $65.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $118.11 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $135.51 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $118.52 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $127.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +143.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $52.88 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $121.69 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $179.28 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $157.85 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $110.84 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $106.32 Million | $3.62 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $64.86 Million | $479.66 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $55.35 Million | $477.23 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $66.98 Million | $481.91 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $71.31 Million | $460.64 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $78.11 Million | $455.41 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $55.70 Million | $329.00 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $67.52 Million | $302.22 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $50.20 Million | $293.90 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $53.90 Million | $255.10 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $41.60 Million | $226.40 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $31.60 Million | $199.50 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $31.30 Million | $143.80 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $23.80 Million | $114.30 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $14.60 Million | $108.80 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $18.00 Million | $91.80 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $11.20 Million | $64.10 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $10.70 Million | $78.80 Million | — |