Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.98 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Dine Brands Global Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dine Brands Global Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dine Brands Global Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Dine Brands Global Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dine Brands Global Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dine Brands Global Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Dine Brands Global Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $89.00 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $108.16 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $131.14 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $89.34 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $195.84 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $96.50 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $155.18 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $140.35 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $65.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $118.11 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $135.51 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $118.52 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $127.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +143.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $52.88 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $121.69 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $179.28 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $157.85 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $110.84 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $106.32 Million | $3.62 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $64.86 Million | $479.66 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $55.35 Million | $477.23 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $66.98 Million | $481.91 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $71.31 Million | $460.64 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $78.11 Million | $455.41 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $55.70 Million | $329.00 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $67.52 Million | $302.22 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $50.20 Million | $293.90 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $53.90 Million | $255.10 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $41.60 Million | $226.40 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $31.60 Million | $199.50 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $31.30 Million | $143.80 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $23.80 Million | $114.30 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $14.60 Million | $108.80 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $18.00 Million | $91.80 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $11.20 Million | $64.10 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $10.70 Million | $78.80 Million | — |