Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.06 Billion) in one year. See DIN financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dine Brands Global Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dine Brands Global Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dine Brands Global Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dine Brands Global Inc. Check Dine Brands Global Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $89.00 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $108.16 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $131.14 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $89.34 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $195.84 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $96.50 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $155.18 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $140.35 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $65.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $118.11 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $135.51 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $118.52 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $127.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +143.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $52.88 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $121.69 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $179.28 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $157.85 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $110.84 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $106.32 Million | $3.62 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $64.86 Million | $479.66 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $55.35 Million | $477.23 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $66.98 Million | $481.91 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $71.31 Million | $460.64 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $78.11 Million | $455.41 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $55.70 Million | $329.00 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $67.52 Million | $302.22 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $50.20 Million | $293.90 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $53.90 Million | $255.10 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $41.60 Million | $226.40 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $31.60 Million | $199.50 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $31.30 Million | $143.80 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $23.80 Million | $114.30 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $14.60 Million | $108.80 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $18.00 Million | $91.80 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $11.20 Million | $64.10 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $10.70 Million | $78.80 Million | — |