Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.98 Billion) in one year. Explore DIN strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dine Brands Global Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dine Brands Global Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore how large is Dine Brands Global Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dine Brands Global Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dine Brands Global Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DIN market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $89.00 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $108.16 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $131.14 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $89.34 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $195.84 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $96.50 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $155.18 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $140.35 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $65.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $118.11 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $135.51 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $118.52 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $127.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +143.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $52.88 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $121.69 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $179.28 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $157.85 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $110.84 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $106.32 Million | $3.62 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $64.86 Million | $479.66 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $55.35 Million | $477.23 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $66.98 Million | $481.91 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $71.31 Million | $460.64 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $78.11 Million | $455.41 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $55.70 Million | $329.00 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $67.52 Million | $302.22 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $50.20 Million | $293.90 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $53.90 Million | $255.10 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $41.60 Million | $226.40 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $31.60 Million | $199.50 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $31.30 Million | $143.80 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $23.80 Million | $114.30 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $14.60 Million | $108.80 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $18.00 Million | $91.80 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $11.20 Million | $64.10 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $10.70 Million | $78.80 Million | — |