Tae Kyung Ind Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tae Kyung Ind cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tae Kyung Ind (015890) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩6.41 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩389.24 Billion) in one year. Check 015890 cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tae Kyung Ind (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tae Kyung Ind from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tae Kyung Ind across 26 annual periods. Check 015890 operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tae Kyung Ind Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Tae Kyung Ind cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tae Kyung Ind. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tae Kyung Ind operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (KRW) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.21x | ₩42.75 Billion | ₩206.75 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | ₩58.06 Billion | ₩185.60 Billion | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | ₩31.19 Billion | ₩204.20 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | ₩61.68 Billion | ₩199.25 Billion | ▲ +127.4% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | ₩26.64 Billion | ₩195.69 Billion | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | ₩59.78 Billion | ₩218.16 Billion | ▲ +248.5% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | ₩18.28 Billion | ₩232.42 Billion | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | ₩39.88 Billion | ₩211.14 Billion | ▲ +155.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | ₩17.42 Billion | ₩235.81 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | ₩23.11 Billion | ₩209.67 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | ₩24.05 Billion | ₩161.22 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | ₩34.31 Billion | ₩153.43 Billion | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | ₩30.07 Billion | ₩152.75 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | ₩32.45 Billion | ₩162.32 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | ₩54.35 Billion | ₩155.92 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | ₩48.57 Billion | ₩104.29 Billion | ▲ +255.9% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | ₩12.04 Billion | ₩92.04 Billion | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | ₩29.54 Billion | ₩83.78 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | ₩28.64 Billion | ₩93.69 Billion | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | ₩15.67 Billion | ₩94.99 Billion | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | ₩33.27 Billion | ₩104.05 Billion | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | ₩20.21 Billion | ₩114.63 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | ₩33.87 Billion | ₩125.09 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | ₩23.89 Billion | ₩90.31 Billion | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | ₩7.00 Billion | ₩35.36 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | ₩9.74 Billion | ₩39.64 Billion | — |